Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Latha vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 7735 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7735 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2022

Madras High Court
Latha vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 12 April, 2022
                                                                              W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019



                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 12.04.2022

                                                      CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                             W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019

                     1. Latha
                     2. Dharamaraja
                     3. Selvaraj
                     4. P.Sumathi                                       ... Petitioners
                                                          -vs-

                     1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                     Rep., by its Secretary,
                     Department of Higher Education,
                     Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

                     2. The Director of Collegiate Education,
                     Directorate of Collegiate Education,
                     9th Floor, EVK Sambath Maligai,
                     College Road, Chennai-600006.

                     3. The Registrar,
                     Madurai Kamaraj University,
                     Palkalai Nagar, Madurai-625 021,
                     Madurai District.                                  ... Respondents

                     Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                     for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to

                     _________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019



                     regularization of service of the petitioners by considering the petitioners'
                     representation dated 10.04.2019.

                                   For Petitioners     :         Mr.R.Alagarsamy

                                   For RR1 & 2         :         Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh
                                                                 Additional Government Pleader

                                   For R3              :         Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar

                                                           ******

                                                           ORDER

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the

respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners by considering their

representation dated 10.04.2019.

2. Mere representation by an employee cannot be a ground to

grant the benefit of regularisation and permanent absorption. Such benefits

are to be granted strictly in accordance with the rules in force.

Appointments are to be made by following the procedures and in

accordance with the rules. Equal opportunity in public employment is the

constitutional mandate.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019

3. All appointments are to be made in accordance with the

constitutional scheme and by providing opportunity to all the eligible

candidates, who all are longing to secure appointment through open

competitive process. Therefore, the temporary employees who were

appointed in violation of the recruitment rules are not entitle to claim

regularisation and permanent absorption. The principles in this regard are

settled by the Hon'ble Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case

of Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Umadevi [(2006) 4 SCC 1]. Even in

the subsequent judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reiterated that the

irregular appointees cannot claim the benefit of regularisation and

permanent absorption in violation of the service rules. Persons who have

entered into service through backdoors cannot be provided with the benefit

of regularisation and permanent absorption.

4. Admittedly, in the present case, the petitioners were appointed

as non-teaching staffs on temporary basis. Therefore, they have to

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019

participate in the process of selection, if any notification is issued and if

they are regularly selected, then alone they can seek such benefits, but not

otherwise.

5. With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands

dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

12.04.2022 Internet:Yes Index:Yes

abr

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019

To

1. The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Director of Collegiate Education, Directorate of Collegiate Education, 9th Floor, EVK Sambath Maligai, College Road, Chennai-600006.

3. The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai-625 021, Madurai District.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

abr

W.P.(MD) No.14422 of 2019

12.04.2022

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter