Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7466 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022
C.M.P. No.9868 of 2019
in S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
C.M.P. No.9868 of 2019
in S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
C.M.P. No.9868 of 2019
in S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
Kanniappan .. Petitioner
Vs.
Dhanabaggiam .. Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order 41 Rule 3A r/w.
Order 42 Rule 1 C.P.C., to condone the delay of 350 days in filing the
second appeal against the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.422 of
2007 on 21.11.2014 by District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu and confirmed
in A.S.No.11 of 2016 by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu
dated 03.10.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr. P.Thiagarajan
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P. No.9868 of 2019
in S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
Kanniappan .. Appellant
Vs.
Dhanabaggiam .. Respondent
Appeal suit is sought to be filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the
judgment and decree made in A.S. No.11 of 2016 on the file of the
Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu dated 03.10.2017 confirming the
judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.422 of 2007 on the file of District
Munsif Court, Chengalpattu dated 21.11.2014.
For appellant : Mr. P.Thiagarajan
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner produced a copy of
memo dated 18.08.2021, stating that he has instructions from his client to
withdraw the civil miscellaneous petition and the unnumbered second
appeal. The original memo stated to have been filed is not available in the
bundle. He further submitted that the respondent is petitioner's mother and
that the petitioner is continuously in occupation of a portion of the property
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P. No.9868 of 2019 in S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
after the death of respondent and that there is no dispute with regard to his
right over the suit property at the instance of other legal heirs of
respondent. Though the petitioner seeks liberty to initiate legal proceedings
as against the legal heirs, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does
not press for liberty as this Court declined to give liberty on a memo
without issuing notice to respondent.
2. Recording the statements of the learned counsel for the petitioner,
the civil miscellaneous petition and the above unnumbered second appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
08.04.2022 bkn
To:
1. The Additional Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.
2. The District Judge, (Training) Additional District Munsif -II,
Tiruvannamalai.
3. The Section Officer, V.R.Records, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P. No.9868 of 2019 in S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
S.S.SUNDAR, J.,
bkn
C.M.P. No.9868 of 2019 in S.A. Sr. No.33455 of 2019
08.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!