Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7454 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022
C.R.P(MD)No.1617 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.04.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.R.P(MD)No.1617 of 2012
1.J.Sivakumar
2.J.Babu ... Petitioners/
Respondents/
Defendants/
Judgment Debtors
Vs.
S.Kumaravel ... Respondent/
Petitioner/
Plaintiffs/
Decree Holder
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of
Constitution of India, as against the fair order and decreetal order, dated
11.07.2012 passed in E.P.No.110 of 2009 in O.S.No.136 of 2007 on the
file of the I Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil.
For Petitioners : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.R.T.Arivukumar
for Mr.R.Manimaran
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P(MD)No.1617 of 2012
ORDER
The present revision petition has been filed by the judgment
debtor, challenging the allowing of execution proceedings, in which civil
arrest was ordered as against the judgment debtor. The plaintiff has
obtained the decree for recovery of money on 06.08.2009. The said
decree was put to execution in E.P.No.110 of 2009 seeking for civil
arrest of the judgment debtor. After giving due opportunity to the
judgment debtor in E.P.No.110 of 2009 was allowed on 11.07.2012,
under which the civil arrest was ordered. The said order is under the
challenge in the present revision petition. Originally, an order of interim
stay was granted by this Court in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012. However, the
said suit was closed on 01.12.2020.
2. That apart, the judgment debtor has chosen to file
C.R.P(MD)No.1782 of 2010 in which orders were passed on 12.01.2011,
granting extention of time to the judgment debtor to deposit a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- on or before 22.01.2011. According to the learned Counsel
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.1617 of 2012
for the decree holder/respondent in the revision petition, the said order
has also not been complied with.
3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner/judgment debtor
has filed a Memo on 06.04.2022 reporting "No instructions". Today, the
matter is listed after printing the name of the revision petitioner. Even
today, there is no representation on the side of the revision petitioner
either in person or through a Counsel.
4. Admittedly, the revision petitioner has suffered a money decree
and an order of civil arrest has been passed. This Court has already
vacated the interim orders in the revision on 01.12.2020. The judgment
debtor has also not complied with the orders passed by this Court in
C.R.P(MD)No.1782 of 2010 and the revision petitioner has chosen to
keep himself away from the Court. I do not find any merits on this case.
This revision petition stands dismissed. No costs.
08.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.1617 of 2012
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No btr
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1.The I Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.1617 of 2012
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
btr
Order made in C.R.P(MD)No.1617 of 2012
08.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!