Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

C. Loganathan vs The Deputy Commissioner (St)
2022 Latest Caselaw 7389 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7389 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022

Madras High Court
C. Loganathan vs The Deputy Commissioner (St) on 8 April, 2022
                                                                                      W.A.No.963 of 2022

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 08.04.2022

                                                           CORAM

                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
                                             and
                      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

                                                 Writ Appeal No.963 of 2022

                     C. Loganathan                                                        ..
                     Appellant
                                                            Versus

                     The Deputy Commissioner (ST)
                     O/o. The Deputy Commissioner (ST)
                     Inspection-II
                     No.1 Greams Road
                     Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006                                .. Respondent

                            Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
                     dated 01.12.2021 passed in W.P. No. 17519 of 2021 on the file of this
                     Court.

                     For Appellant                  :      Mr. S. Muthu Venkataraman
                     For Respondent                 :      Mr. C. Harsha Raj
                                                           Additional Government Pleader

                                                      JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN,J.]

This Writ Appeal is filed by the appellant seeking to set aside the

order dated 01.12.2021 passed in W.P. No. 17519 of 2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.963 of 2022

2. The appellant claims himself to be a poor car mechanic and

he does not possess even a basic school education besides having

challenged language skills. According to him, he did not have any taxable

income for the periods from 2017-2018 to 2020-2021. However, as per

the advise of his well wishers, he engaged a tax consultant to take care of

his returns and accordingly, the said tax consultant filed 'nil' return on

behalf of the appellant. It is claimed by the appellant that during

February 2020, exploiting his ignorance, his GST Registration was

misused by some third parties by creating artificial sale transactions in the

name of five companies. On coming to know about the misdeeds, a

detailed complaint was given by the appellant. While so, to his shock and

surprise, demand notices dated 09.12.2020 and 01.02.2021 were issued

by the State Tax Officer, Grade II, Inspection II, Chennai – 6, calling

upon the appellant to pay tax to the tune of Rs.1,47,27,932/- for the

period from April 2019 to March 2020, including penalty. Subsequently,

an order was passed by the respondent authorities on 09.02.2021

confirming the said demand. Thereafter, the appellant was issued with

notice dated 24.06.2021 calling upon him to pay the tax along with

penalty. Upon receipt of the same, he sent legal notice dated 19.07.2021,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.963 of 2022

however, the same was not considered. Stating that due to ignorance of

the legal consequences, he could not file the appeal against the order

passed, he invoked the writ jurisdiction by filing W.P. No. 17519 of 2021

seeking to issue a direction to the respondent to take his appeal through

off-line mode, based on his legal Notice dated 19.07.2021. However, the

learned Judge, by order dated 01.12.2021, disposed of the writ petition in

the following terms:

“3.Since the petitioner has now received a copy of the aforesaid Assessment Order dated 09.02.2021 bearing reference Order in GST No.33AGGPC9974M1ZW/2019-2020, liberty is given to the petitioner to file an Appeal before the Appellate Commissioner in accordance with the relevant Rules within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such Appeal is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, the Appellate Commissioner shall thereafter take up the Appeal and dispose the same within a period of three months in accordance with law and on merits. The respondent shall keep the recovery proceeding in abeyance till such time.”

The aforesaid order passed by the learned Judge is under challenge in this

writ appeal by the appellant.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.963 of 2022

order copy was received by the appellant on 28.01.2022, however, owing

to the very high stakes involved in the case, which require the appellant to

pay huge amount towards pre-deposit, the statutory appeal could not be

filed by him, within the time limit specified by the learned Judge. The

learned counsel further submitted that the Honourable Supreme Court, in

order to mitigate the hardships faced by the litigants due to the on-set of

Covid-19 Pandemic, passed an order dated 23.03.2021 in MA.No.21 of

2022 in MA.No.665 of 2021 in suo motu WP (C)No.3 of 2020 In Re:

Cognizance for extension of Limitation, whereby the period of limitation

in filing the petitions/ applications/ suits/ appeals / all other proceedings,

irrespective of the period of limitation prescribed under the General or

Special Laws, shall stand extended with effect from 15.03.2020 until

further orders. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in effect, extended the

limitation period for filing of appeal in all cases, where the limitation

expires during the period between 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022 for 90

days from 01.03.2022. The above verdict is also applicable to the

assessment order in question, as it falls within the period from

15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022. Therefore, the learned counsel prayed that

the appellant may be permitted to file the statutory appeal against the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.963 of 2022

assessment order passed by the respondent, within the prescribed time

limit namely 90 days from 01.03.2022 to 28.05.2022.

4. On the above contentions, Heard Mr. C. Harsha Raj, learned

Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, who fairly

agreed for the extension of time for filing appeal by the appellant, in the

light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred to above.

5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel

for the appellant, which has also been agreed on the side of the

respondent, this court grants time for filing the statutory appeal by the

appellant, within 90 days from 01.03.2022.

6. The order of the learned Judge dated 01.12.2021 in

WP.No.17519 of 2021 stands modified to the extent as indicated above.

Accordingly, this writ appeal stands disposed of. No costs.

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 08.04.2022 msr/rsh Index:Yes/no

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.963 of 2022

msr/rsh

To

The Deputy Commissioner (ST) O/o. The Deputy Commissioner (ST), Inspection-II, No.1 Greams Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

W.A. No.963 of 2022

08.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter