Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7299 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2022
Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Crl.RC.No.739 of 2019
and Crl.M.P.No.4860 of 2022
S.Manivannan ... Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
P.Sathishkumar ... Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of
Cr.P.C. to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence dated
05.06.2018 made in S.T.C.No.317 of 2017, on the file of the learned
Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.1, Erode, as confirmed by the judgment
dated 07.12.2018 in C.A.No.269 of 2018 on the file of the learned II
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad
For Respondent : Mr.N.Somasundaram
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the judgment
of conviction and sentence dated 05.06.2018 made in S.T.C.No.317 of
2017, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.1, Erode, as
confirmed by the judgment dated 07.12.2018 in C.A.No.269 of 2018 on
the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019
2. The revision petitioner herein is the sole accused in the
above referred case. The said case has been filed by the respondent
herein as against the petitioner, alleging that he committed an offence
under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial Court, after
concluding the trial, found the petitioner guilty under Section 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, convicted and sentenced him to undergo
simple imprisonment for six months and to pay compensation of
Rs.1,80,000/- to the complainant under Section 357(3) of Cr.P.C., failing
which the accused shall undergo default sentence of one month simple
imprisonment. In the appeal preferred by the petitioner in C.A.No.269 of
2018, the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode,
confirmed the findings arrived at by the trial Court and dismissed the
appeal. Challenging the said concurrent findings, the petitioner filed
Criminal Revision Case in Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019, before this Court.
3. Today, when this Criminal Revision Case came up for hearing,
Mr.N.Somasundaram, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.
Further, the revision petitioner/accused and the respondent/complainant,
were also present before this Court. The revision Petitioner has filed a
petition in Crl.M.P.No.4860 of 2022 under Section 147 of NI Act,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019
wherein he prayed to compound the offence. Further, along with the said
application, he has filed a copy of the 'Joint Memo of Compromise' dated
07.04.2022, through which the dispute having by the petitioner and the
respondent, is amicably settled out of Court.
4. It is the further submission of the learned counsel on either side
that as per the direction of the this Court while suspending the sentence
imposed upon the petitioner vide order dated 29.10.2019, made in
Crl.M.P.Nos.10388 & 10391 of 2019 in Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019, the
petitioner herein deposited a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- to the credit of
S.T.C.No.317 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I,
Erode, and the same has been subsequently withdrawn by the respondent
herein. Balance amount of Rs.80,000/- out of the total cheque amount
i.e. Rs.1,80,000/- was paid by this petitioner to the respondent, in two
spells viz., Rs.30,000/- on 07.03.2022 and 07.04.2022, vide
D.D.Nos.513447 and 513476, respectively, drawn on City Union Bank,
Modakurichi Branch.
5. In view of the above, as the present offence committed by the
revision petitioner/accused under Section 138 of NI Act, is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019
compoundable under Section 147 of the Act, the contents of the 'Joint
Memo of Compromise' dated 07.04.2022 was read out to both parties and
the same has been agreed by either side as found correct. Accordingly,
this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition in Crl.M.P.No.4860 of 2022, is
allowed and the offence committed by the petitioner/accused under
Section 138 of NI Act, is compounded.
6. Ultimately, in view of the order now passed in Crl.M.P.No.4860
of 2022, this Court is inclined to pass the following orders :-
(i) The judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Courts below are set aside and the accused is acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the NI Act.
(ii) The Joint Memo of Compromise dated 07.04.2022 shall form part and parcel of this Order.
7. With the above directions, this Criminal Revision Petition
stands closed.
07.04.2022
Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes / No
ars
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019
To
1. The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
2. The Judicial Magistrate-I, Erode.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.739 of 2019
R.PONGIAPPAN, J.
ars
Crl.RC.No.739 of 2019
07.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!