Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7259 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2022
W.A.No.926 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.4.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI,
CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.No.926 of 2022
1.Mrs.Preetha V.Kannan
2.Mr.Vaanan Vetrivel Kannan
3.Mr.Arun Vetrivel Kannan .. Appellants
vs
1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office,
Sengadu, Yercaud, Salem-636601.
2.The Village Administrative Officer,
Semmanatham Village,
Yercaud Taluk, Salem. .. Respondents
Prayer: APPEAL under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order dated 18.2.2022 in W.P.No.2971 of 2022.
For Appellants : Mr.P.J.Rishikesh
For Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar,
State Government Pleader
___________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.926 of 2022
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The writ appeal has been preferred against the order dated
18.2.2022 passed in W.P.No.2971 of 2022 presuming that a finding
against the petitioner has been given by the learned Single Judge in
paragraph 5 of the impugned order.
2. It is a case where the appellants approached the Tahsildar
concerned for transfer of patta. It was declined because the
document produced in support of the claim was not containing the
required details namely survey number and extent. This order was
assailed before the learned Single Judge without taking the
alternate remedy. Therefore, the writ petition was dismissed,
however, granting liberty to the appellants to avail the alternate
remedy.
3. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that in
paragraph 5 of the impugned order, a finding on the merits of the
case has been recorded by the learned Single Judge.
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.926 of 2022
4. We do not find any finding in the impugned order. Rather,
the learned Single had given a reference to the order passed by the
Tahsildar rejecting the application for transfer of patta. In any case,
we have clarified that no finding has been recorded while dismissing
the writ petition. The issue would be decided by the Appellate
Authority independently.
5. In view of the above, we do not find any purpose to cause
interference with the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
6. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed with the above
observation. There will be no order as to costs.
(M.N.B., CJ.) (D.B.C.J.)
06.4.2022
Index : Yes/No
To:
1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sengadu, Yercaud, Salem-636601.
2.The Village Administrative Officer, Semmanatham Village, Yercaud Taluk, Salem.
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.926 of 2022
M.N.BHANDARI, CJ AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J
RS
W.A.No.926 of 2022
06.4.2022
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!