Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7125 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2022
C.R.P.(NPD) No.871 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.04.2022
CORAM : JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
C.R.P.(NPD) No.871 of 2022
A.N.Vijaykumar ... Petitioner Decree holder / Petitioner
Vs.
R.Kaviraj ... Respondent / Judgment Debtor /
Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India, praying to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 01.03.2022
passed in E.A.No.4/2021 in E.P.No.4562/2019 on the file of X Assistant
City Civil Court, Chennai, by allowing the revision.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Chitra Sampath
Senior Counsel
Assisted by Mr.T.S.Baskarab
For Respondent : Ms.R.Chitra
ORDER
This revision is preferred by the plaintiff, who now challenges the order of
the Execution Court in E.A.No.4/2021 in E.P.No.4562 of 2019 in
O.S.No.6856/2011 on the file of the X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(NPD) No.871 of 2022
2. The revision petitioner has laid a suit for recovery of certain sum of
money, and also obtained an order of attachment before judgment on the
first floor and the terrace portion of a certain building, which as per the
application taken out for the purpose, originally bears the Door No.1/105,
then Door No.154 and currently Door No.68. There is no confusion as to
the identity of the property attached. The decree subsequently came to be
passed, and the execution petition is laid for sale of the property. And for
the said purpose, the execution order and sale papers were made available
by the plaintiff, by which time, the Execution Court insisted the plaintiff /
decree holder / revision petitioner for production of property tax, register
extract etc., After procedural difficulty, this was made available, which
shows that the property that was sought to be sold bears Door No.154.
Therefore, the plaintiff took out an application in E.A.No.4/2021 for
correcting the door number as 154/2 in the schedule of property in the
execution petition. This was dismissed by the Execution Court on the
ground that the plaintiff ought to apply for correcting the door number in
the decree passed in the suit. This is under challenge.
3. Heard both sides. What the Execution Court appears to have missed is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(NPD) No.871 of 2022
that, the suit is for money, and that it is not going to have any schedule of
property in it. The attachment before judgment is made in a
supplementary proceedings, and the property attached is brought to sale in
the process of executing the money decree. Therefore, the Execution Court
is clearly in error insisting the decree holder to apply for correcting the
decree.
4. In fine, this Court allows the revision, sets aside the order of the
Execution Court in E.A.No.4/2021 in E.P.No.4562/2019 in
O.S.No.6856/2011. No costs. The revision petitioner is now required to
carry out necessary correction of the door number in the schedule of
property to the execution petition.
05.04.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order
ds
To:
The X Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(NPD) No.871 of 2022
N.SESHASAYEE.J.,
ds
C.R.P.(NPD) No.871 of 2022
05.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!