Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7119 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
C.M.A(MD)No.327 of 2022
and
C.M.P(MD)No.3002 of 2022
The Managing Director,
State Express Transport Corporation,
Chennai. :Appellant/Respondent
.vs.
1.Mahalingam
2.Padma
3.Anitha :Respondents/Petitioners
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act,1988 against the order made in M.C.O.P.No.771
of 2018, dated 13.03.2021, on the file of the Motor Accidents
Claims Tribunal(Ist Additional District Judge), Tirunelveli.
For Appellant :Mr.P.M.Vishnuarthanan
JUDGMENT
*********
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed againt the order
made in M.C.O.P.No.771 of 2018, dated 13.03.2021, on the file of
the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal(Ist Additional District Judge),
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tirunelveli.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/Transport
Corporation and perused the materials placed before this Court.
3.The factum of the accident, manner of the accident and the
negligence on the part of the offending vehicle are not disputed and
hence, the findings of the Tribunal with regard to the same are
confirmed.
4.As per Ex.P2-Post-mortem Certificate, the age of the
deceased Manikandan is mentioned as 28 years and as per Ex.P3-
driving licence of the deceased, the date of birth is mentioned as
20.05.1989 namely, 28 years and ten months. Though he claimed
to have working in a textile shop, earning Rs.20,000/- per month,
he has only filed Ex.P4-Diploma Completion Certificate in Computer
Engineeing from a Polytechnic College,however, the claimants have
not produced any positive evidence to show the monthly income of
the deceased and hence, the Tribunal fixed the monthly income of
the deceased Manikandan at Rs.9,000/-p.m., for the accident taken
place in the year 2018. As per Pranay Sethi's case, 40% future
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis prospects has to be added and hence the total income is Rs.9,000/-
+ Rs.3,600/- = Rs.12,600/-.Since the deceased is a bachelor, 50%
of the income has to be deducted towards his personal expenses
and hence the annual income is Rs.12,600/- - Rs.6300/- = Rs.
6300/- x 12 = Rs.75,600/- and as per Sarla Verma's case, '17'
multiplier is adopted and hence the loss of income is arrived at Rs.
12,85,200/-.The other heads of compensation awarded by the
Tribunal appears to be just and reasonable. Hence this Court is of
the view that the total compensation as awarded by the Tribunal is
just, fair and reasonable, which cannot be termed as excessive,
warranting interference by this Court.
5.In this view of the matter, this Court finds no merit in the
appeal and accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands
dismissed and the award of the Tribunal stands confirmed. No
costs.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
05.04.2022
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To
1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Ist Additional District Judge), Tirunelveli.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.,J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A(MD)No.327 of 2022 and C.M.P(MD)No.3002 of 2022
05.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!