Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Flower Family Beauty Parlour ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 7062 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7062 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2022

Madras High Court
M/S.Flower Family Beauty Parlour ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 5 April, 2022
                                                                      W.P.No.8064 of 2022

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                          DATED : 05.04.2022

                                                CORAM

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

                                          W.P.No.8064 of 2022

              M/s.Flower Family Beauty Parlour Saloon @ Spa
              Rep. its Proprietor S.Srinivasan
              S/o. Sukkalachary,
              carrying on business at
              No.14/14, Ramadoss Nagar,
              Sembium, Redhills Road, Kolathur,
              Chennai – 600 099.                                 ... Petitioner

                                                 Vs.

              1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                Represented by its Secretary,
                Home Department,
                Fort St. George,
                Chennai - 600 009.

              2.The Commissioner of Police,
                O/o. Commissioner of Police,
                132, EVK Sampath Rd, Vepery,
                Periyamet,
                Chennai – 600007.

              3.The Inspector of Police,
                V6, Kolathur Police Station,
                3rd Street, Vasantham Nagar,
                Kumaran Nagar, Kolathur,
                 Chennai – 600 082.                             ... Respondents


                 ____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
              Page No. 1 of 6
                                                                                  W.P.No.8064 of 2022

              Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a
              Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second and third respondents or their men,
              agents from interfering with the peaceful conduct of petitioner's business in
              the name and style of "Flower Family Beauty Parlour Saloon & Spa” at Door
              No.14/14,           Ramadoss       Nagar,       Sembium,         Redhills      Road,
              Kolathur, Chennai – 600 009.
                                     For Petitioner       : Mr.G.V.Sridharan

                                     For Respondents : Mr.Gokulakrishnan
                                                       Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                      ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of

Mandamus, to forbear the second and third respondents or their men, agents

from interfering with the peaceful conduct of petitioner's business in the name

and style of "Flower Family Beauty Parlour Saloon & Spa” at Door No.14/14,

Ramadoss Nagar, Sembium, Redhills Road, Kolathur, Chennai – 600 099.

2. According to the petitioner, he is carrying on business i.e., Salon and

Spa, doing haircuts and provide cross massage in the name and style of

"Flower Family Beauty Parlour Saloon & Spa" at Door No.14/14, Ramadoss

Nagar, Sembium, Redhills Road, Kolathur, Chennai – 600 099 without giving

room to any sorts of complaint or whatsoever. The petitioner business is also

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.8064 of 2022

assessed to professional tax whereas, the third respondent has frequently

came and interfering with the business activities of the petitioner's Salon and

Spa and thereby, causing hardship to the customers for their service. In order

to prevent hardship, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ

petition.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the

respondents would submit that the respondents are not interfering with the

business activities of the petitioner.

4. This Court, in similar circumstances, following the ratio laid down

by this court in the judgment report in 2015(1) MLJ 308 [Masti Health and

Beauty Private limited & Others V. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai

City], disposed of the Writ Petition in W.P.No.9380 of 2016, by order dated

14.03.2016, by directing the respondents-police to comply with the

directions/conditions imposed in paragraph 67 of the order in the judgment

reported in 2015(1) MLJ 308 (cited supra) and further made it clear that the

petitioner therein under the guise of carrying on business activity shall not

indulge in any unlawful or illegal activities detrimental to law and order or

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.8064 of 2022

public order.

5. Since the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is identical to

the issue involved in W.P.No.9380 of 2016, it is relevant to extract para 67

of the order passed in 2015(1) MLJ 308 (cited supra), which reads as

follows:-

"67. In the light of the above, all the writ petitions are disposed of to the following effect :

(i) The respondents shall not, as a matter of routine and without any basis, conduct any raids and interfere with the business carried on by the petitioners;

(ii) In specific cases where the police have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence punishable under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act has been or is being committed, it is open to the police to take action, after scrupulously following all the steps indicated in Section 15 of the said Act. The steps to be followed are narrated by me in paragraph 28 above; and

(iii) Based upon the laws enacted in various States of the United States of America and Singapore, which I have dealt with in paragraphs 39 to 54, the respondents may take appropriate steps for bringing in either a new legislation or a subordinate legislation in terms of the provisions of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act or the Chennai City Police Act, so that public order, decency and morality, which can form the basis for a regulatory law under Article 19(2) of The Constitution, are taken care of. The Government shall file a report on or before 31.3.2015, before this Court, about the decision taken. No costs. Consequently, all connected pending

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.8064 of 2022

MPs are closed."

6. In the light of the said order, the Writ Petition is disposed of, by

directing the respondents-police to comply with the directions imposed in

para 67 of the order as extracted above. It is also made clear that the

petitioner under the guise of carrying on business activity shall not indulge in

any unlawful or illegal activities detrimental to law and order or public order.

No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

05.04.2022

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking Order kmm/nti

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.8064 of 2022

nti/kmm

To

1.The Secretary, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, 132, EVK Sampath Rd, Vepery, Periyamet, Chennai – 600007.

3.The Inspector of Police, V6, Kolathur Police Station, 3rd Street, Vasantham Nagar, Kumaran Nagar, Kolathur, Chennai – 600 082.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

W.P.No.8064 of 2022

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter