Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Sadasivam vs The Principal Secretary/State ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 6968 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6968 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022

Madras High Court
S.Sadasivam vs The Principal Secretary/State ... on 4 April, 2022
                                                                               W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021



                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                      DATED : 04.04.2022

                                                            CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                                    W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021

                     S.Sadasivam                                                   ... Petitioner

                                                              -vs-

                     The Principal Secretary/State Tax Commissioner,
                     Commercial Tax Department,
                     Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.                              ... Respondent

                     Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                     for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing respondent to include the
                     petitioner name into old pension scheme and sanction monthly pension after
                     attaining superannuation by dispose petitioner's representation dated
                     29.01.2021 within time limit stipulated by this Court

                                   For Petitioner       :        Mr.D.Selvanayagam

                                   For Respondent       :        Mr.M.Ramesh
                                                                 Government Advocate

                                                            ******



                     _________
                     Page 1 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021



                                                          ORDER

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the

respondents to include the petitioner's name in the old pension scheme and

sanction monthly pension under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules. The

petitioner was appointed in the post of Clerk in Chinthalavadi Handloom

Weavers Cooperative Society, Kulithalai Taluk, Trichy District on

13.07.1987 and he was promoted to the post of Manager and thereafter, the

society was dissolved due to financial loss. The petitioner was relieved

from service on 26.05.2004, after completion of 16 years of service. The

employment seniority of the petitioner was restored by the District

Employment Exchange, as he was relieved from the Cooperative Society.

Thereafter, he was appointed to the post of Typist by the District Collector,

Karur under Rule 10A(1) of the State and Subordinate Service Rules. The

petitioner appeared in the special recruitment test conducted by the Tamil

Nadu Public Service Commission and was successful. Thus, his services

were regularised in the post of Typist and thereafter, he was promoted to the

post of Deputy Tax Officer with effect from 17.10.2017.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the services rendered by

him in the Cooperative Society are to be taken into consideration for the

purpose of calculating the qualifying service for grant of pension.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that

since Cooperative Society is also a registered society, the period of service

rendered by the petitioner is to be reckoned for the purpose of calculating

the qualifying services for settling the retirement benefits. In this regard,

the learned counsel relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

Prem Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516.

para 36 and 37

4. As far as the case cited supra is concerned, the project is a

Government project and the petitioner before the Hon'ble Supreme Court

was employed in work-charged service. However, the said judgment cannot

have any direct implication, as counting of the services in Tamil Nadu

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021

Government Service is to be done with reference to the Tamil Nadu Pension

Rules.

5. The application of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 has

been enumerated in Rule 2. Rule 2 categorically states that “save as

otherwise provided in these rules, these rules shall apply to all Government

Servants appointed to services and posts in connection with the affairs of

the State which are borne on pensionable establishments whether temporary

or permanent, but shall not apply to – (a) persons in casual and daily rated

employment; (b) persons paid from contingencies; (c) persons employed on

contract except when the contract provides otherwise; (d) members of the

All-India Services; (e) persons entitled to the benefit of a Contributory

Provident Fund; and (f) persons who are entitled to the benefits under the

Factories Act, 1948 and the Employees' Provident Fund Act, 1952,

excluding those who are governed by Statutory Service Rules and belong to

pensionable service.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021

6. Rule 2 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules categorically

enumerates that private services rendered in any organisation, which is not a

State cannot be counted for grant of pensionary benefits under the Tamil

Nadu Pension Rules.

7. Cooperative Society is registered under the provisions of the

Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioner was appointed in a

Cooperative Society, which is not a 'State' within the meaning of Article 12

of the Constitution of India. When the Cooperative Society is not a State

within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, then the Tamil Pension

Rules, 1978 is not applicable in respect of services rendered in a registered

Cooperative Society, which is not a State.

8. This Court is of the considered opinion that the private services

rendered in a registered society which is not a State cannot be reckoned for

the purpose of counting qualifying service to grant pensionary benefits.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021

9. In the present case, the petitioner admittedly was employed in a

Cooperative Society registered under the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies

Act, which is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the

Constitution of India. Therefore, his services in the Cooperative Society

cannot be counted for the purpose of calculating the qualifying service.

Thus, the petitioner has not established any acceptable ground for the

purpose of granting the relief as such sought for in the present writ petition

and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

10. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. However,

there shall be no order as to costs.

04.04.2022 Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No

abr

To

The Principal Secretary/State Tax Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

abr

W.P.(MD) No.5571 of 2021

04.04.2022

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter