Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20099 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2021
Crl.OP.No.4374 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 30.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Crl.OP.No.4374 of 2016 & Crl.MP.Nos.2282 & 2283 of 2016
[Video Conferencing]
Kathirvel ... Petitioner
Versus
1.The State Rep by its,
The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Salem District.
2.Sangeetha ... Respondents
Prayer : - Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
to call for the entire records connected with the case in C.C.No.575/2020 on
the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Salem quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Gnanasekaran
for Mr.S.Jeyakumar
For R1 : Mr.E.Raj Thilak
Additional Public Prosecutor
For R2 : No appearance
1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Crl.OP.No.4374 of 2016
ORDER
This petition has been filed by the 1st accused seeking interference
with further proceedings in C.C.No.575 of 2020 which is now pending on
the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Attur, Salem.
2.Originally the matter was pending before the Judicial Magistrate
No.II, Attur as C.C.No.4 of 2012.
3.Heard Mr.P.Gnanasekaran learned counsel appearing on behalf of
Mr.S.Jeyakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
4.I am informed that the matter is in trial stage and as a matter of fact
had been listed yesterday (29.09.2021) for examination of LW-13 who is the
Investigation Officer.
5.This naturally means that the counsels for the petitioner herein are
actively participating in the trial proceeding. I am confident that they will
take up every issue which the learned counsel now wants this Court to
agitate. There is substantial evidence available on the file of the Magistrate
who is conducting the trial and it is open to the Magistrate to appreciate
such evidence and pass judgment on merits. All the points urged now would
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.OP.No.4374 of 2016
have been taken note of the learned counsel who is conducting trial.
6.Let the trial move forward and a decision be given on the basis of
the evidence adduced during the course of trial. It would be highly
inappropriate on the part of this Court to interfere with the trial proceedings
at this stage, particularly during the course of examination of the
Investigation Officer. Hence, the present Criminal Original Petition is
dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
7.A direction is given to the petitioner to go back to the trial Court
and continue to participate in the trial proceedings with much prudence.
30.09.2021
smv
Internet : Yes
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.VI, Salem.
2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Salem District.
3.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.OP.No.4374 of 2016
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.,
smv
Crl.OP.No.4374 of 2016
30.09.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!