Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Shanthi
2021 Latest Caselaw 19666 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19666 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Shanthi on 24 September, 2021
                                                                                 C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 24.09.2021

                                                      CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                             C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021 &
                                              CMP.No.15805 of 2021

                      The Managing Director,
                      Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited,
                      Kancheepuram District.                               ...      Appellant

                                                         Vs
                      1.Shanthi
                      2.S.Arun
                      3.S.Sathyaraj
                      4.S.Sudhakar                                         ...     Respondents

                      PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                      Vehicles Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 06.09.2019 made in
                      MCOP.No.36 of 2013 on the file of the I Additional District Judge,
                      Tindivanam.


                            For Appellant                 : Mr.K.J.Sivakumar




                      1/8




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                   C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021


                                                     JUDGMENT

This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the Transport

Corporation challenging the award dated 06.04.2019 passed by the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Judge, Tindivanam in

MCOP.No.36 of 2013.

Heard Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, learned counsel for the Appellant. Since no

adverse orders are going to be passed against the respondents/claimants,

notice to the respondents is dispensed with by this Court.

The Appellant Transport Corporation has challenged the award only

on the ground that the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal to

the respondents/claimants is excessive.

The respondents/claimants are the dependants of the deceased

M.Sundaramurthy who died on 02.02.2009 as a result of an accident caused

by a vehicle owned by the Appellant Transport Corporation. The

respondents/claimants preferred a compensation claim before the Tribunal

for the death of M.Sundaramurthy.

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021

The Tribunal under the impugned award directed the Appellant

Transport Corporation to pay the respondents a compensation of

Rs.23,13,128/- together with interest and costs as detailed hereunder:

                                          Heads                            Award Amount
                                                                               (Rs.)
                          Loss of dependency                 21,43,128/-
                          Loss of love and affection         1,05,000/-
                          Funeral Expenses                   25,000/-
                          Loss of consortium                 40,000/-
                          Total                              23,13,128/-



The deceased M.Sundaramurthy was a senior panman working at

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited, Haldia, West Bengal and earning Rs.18,027/-

per month. Before the Tribunal, the respondents/claimants have filed the

salary certificate of the deceased which has been marked as Ex.P7. The

Tribunal based on the salary certificate fixed the notional monthly income of

the deceased at Rs.14,090/-. The accident happened in the year 2009. Since

the salary certificate has been produced before the Tribunal, this Court does

not find any infirmity in the assessment made by the Tribunal that the

deceased was earning Rs.14,090/- per month at the time of the accident.

2. The Appellant/claimant unsatisfied with the quantum of

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021

compensation awarded by the Tribunal has preferred this appeal seeking for

enhancement.

3. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the

impugned award are as follows:

                                         Heads                     Award Amount
                                                                       (Rs.)
                            Loss of income, Permanent                      2,80,800/-
                            Disability, loss of earning capacity
                            permanently
                            Medical expenses                                  1,635/-
                            Transportation charges                            2,000/-
                            Extra nourishment                                 2,000/-
                            Attender charges                                  2,000/-
                            Loss of amenities                               20,000/-
                            Pain and suffering                              20,000/-
                            Total                                          3,28,435/-

4. This Court by its earlier order dated 28.02.2020, directed the

Appellant/claimant to appear before the Dean, Government Tiruvannamalai

Medical College Hospital, Tiruvannamalai on or before 31.03.2020 for

examination with regard to his disability as a result of the accident which

happened on 03.03.2006 and a copy of the said order was also

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021

communicated to the Dean, Government Tiruvannamalai Medical College

Hospital, Tiruvannamalai by the Registry of this Court.

5. The Dean, Government Tiruvannamalai Medical College Hospital,

Tiruvannamalai has addressed a letter to the Registry of this Court stating

that as per the order of this Court dated 28.02.2020, the Appellant/claimant

has not appeared before him and asked the Appellant/claimant to appear

before him for re-examination on 10.03.2020. Despite the same, the

Appellant/claimant failed to appear before the Dean, Government

Tiruvannamalai Medical College Hospital, Tiruvannamalai on the said date.

6. Once again by order dated 15.06.2021, one more opportunity was

also granted to the Appellant/claimant to appear before the Dean,

Government Tiruvannamalai Medical College Hospital, Tiruvannamalai on

or before 01.07.2021 for examination and directed the Dean, Government

Tiruvannamalai Medical College Hospital, Tiruvannamalai to examine the

Appellant/claimant regarding the disability with reference to functional

disability and submit the report on or before 30.07.2021 to this Court. Till

date, the Appellant/claimant has not appeared for examination.

7. The learned counsel for the second respondent Insurance Company

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021

would submit that the Appellant is not entitled for any enhancement as he

has not suffered any permanent disability and that is the reason, he has not

appeared before the Medical Board for examination. According to her, the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal is already excessive and there is no

scope for any enhancement.

8. From the above, it is clear that the Appellant/claimant is not

interested in examining himself before the Dean, Government

Tiruvannamalai Medical College Hospital, Tiruvannamalai to enable him to

get enhancement of compensation. It can be inferred from the conduct of the

Appellant/claimant that he has not suffered any permanent disability and

does not deserve any enhancement of compensation.

9. For the foregoing reasons, this Court does not finds any merit in

this appeal. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No

costs. The second respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

entire award amount after deducting the amount already deposited if any,

together with interest from the date of claim till the date of deposit and costs

to the credit of MCOP.No.766 of 2006 within a period of four weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made,

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021

the Tribunal shall transfer the amount lying to the credit of MCOP.No.766

of 2006 to the bank account of the first respondent through RTGS within a

period of one week thereafter.

24.09.2021 nl

Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

nl To

1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras.

C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021

http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.A.No.2768 of 2021

24.09.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter