Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nithyakalyani @ Meyammal @ Nithya vs Dass Prakash @ Shanmugaraja
2021 Latest Caselaw 19409 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19409 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021

Madras High Court
Nithyakalyani @ Meyammal @ Nithya vs Dass Prakash @ Shanmugaraja on 22 September, 2021
                                                            Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED :22.09.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
                                     Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021
                                                        and
                                   C.M.P.(MD)Nos.11395 of 2019, 359 and 6209 of 2020

                 Nithyakalyani @ Meyammal @ Nithya                                   ... Petitioner

                                                         -vs-

                 1. Dass Prakash @ Shanmugaraja

                 2. The Manager
                    Sri Bhuvaneswari Locker House
                    Pon.Pudupatti
                    Ponnamaravathi Taluk,
                    Pudukottai District                                      .....Respondents in

TR CMP(MD) No.289 of 2021

Dass Prakash @ Shanmugaraja .....Respondent in TR CMP(MD) No.489 of 2019

PRAYER in Tr.CMP(MD) No. 489 of 2019 : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the petition for restitution of conjugal rights in HMOP No. 310 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai and to transfer the same to the file of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

Family Court, Madurai to be heard along with divorce petition in HMOP No.729 of 2019.

PRAYER in Tr.CMP(MD) No. 289 of 2021: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the suit in O.S.No.69 of 2021 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruamayam and to transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Madurai to be heard along with the divorce petition in HMOP No. 729 of 2019.

In Tr CMP(MD) No.489 of 2019 For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For Respondent : Mr.S.M.Ananthamurugan

In Tr CMP(MD) No.289 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For R1 : Mr.R.Gandhi For R2 : No appearance

COMMON O R D E R

By consent of both counsels, both the Transfer Miscellaneous petitions are

taken up for final hearing.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

2. Tr.CMP(MD) No. 489 of 2019 has been filed to withdraw the HMOP

No. 310 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai and transfer

the same to the file of the Family Court, Madurai to be heard along with HMOP

No. 729 of 2019. Tr.CMP(MD) No.289 of 2021 has been filed seeking to transfer

O.S.No.69 of 2021 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thirumayam to the

file of the Family Court, Madurai to be tried along with HMOP No.729 of 2019

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the marriage

between the petitioner and the first respondent in Tr CMP(MD) No. 289 of 2021

was solemnized on 11.02.2008 at Chokkanathapuram, Sivagangai District. At the

time of marriage the parents of the petitioner had presented 50 sovereigns of gold

jewels, diamond necklace, one pair of diamond studs, one pair of diamond

bangles, silver utensils and other seervarisai materials. Apart from that they have

also presented Rs. 3.75 lakhs as dowry to the first respondent as per their

customs and rites. Further the parents of the petitioner have also presented a

diamond ring to the first respondent at the time of marriage. During marriage the

first respondent/ husband was employed in SMR HR Technologies Sdn Bhd,

Kulalumpur, Malaysia. After the marriage, matrimonial home was set up at

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

Pon. Pudupatti. Three months after marriage the petitioner and the first

respondent travelled to Malaysia and she delivered a baby girl on 02.04.2009

through caesarean and the child was names Kaniskha. The parents of the

petitioner had presented 11 sovereigns of gold jewels, a pair of diamond studs and

silver ornaments to the child Kaniskha. Thereafter on 15.02.2012, the petitioner

delivered a baby boy through caesarean and named him as Muthukumaran. The

parents of the petitioner had presented a pair of diamond studs, a pair of gold

bangles, silver ornaments to the child. On further demand by the first respondent

and on the instigation of the first respondent, the petitioner had paid a sum of Rs.

2 lakhs to the parents of the first respondent on 18.08.2016 and subsequently

during the month of December 2017, the parents of the petitioner had paid a sum

of Rs.2,97,000/- to the father of the first respondent through cheque. Whileso,

there was a matrimonial discord, and since the first respondent made false

allegations against the petitioner touching her character she got separated from

the first respondent and she is presently living with her parents. She had filed

divorce petition in HMOP No.729 of 2019 on the file of the Family Court,

Madurai against the first respondent seeking dissolution of marriage on the

ground of cruelty.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

4. The learned counsel would further submit that entire jewels presented by

the parents of the petitioner to her and her children at the time of birth are kept in

the private locker No. 526 with the second respondent/Sri Bhvaneswari locker

house. The original key of the locker is available with the petitioner. Meanwhile

the petitioner came to understand that the parents of the first respondent were

making arrangement to open the locker with duplicate key without her

knowledge falsely making a plea that the the original key has been lost. The

petitioner coming to know of that has also sent a letter dated 30.01.2019 to the

second respondent not to open the locker without her presence. .Meanwhile the

first respondent has also filed a suit in O.S.No.69 of 2021 on the file of the

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Thirumayam seeking for mandatory

injunction to direct the petitioner to open the locker No.526 with the original key

available with the petitioner. Further the first respondent has also filed HMOP

No.310 of 2019 on the file of the Principle Subordinate Court, Pudukottai seeking

for restitution of conjugal rights. Meanwhile, since the first respondent is

keeping custody of the children and not permitting the petitioner to visit the

children the petitioner has filed GWOP No. 845 of 2019 seeking for permanent

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

custody of the minor childrens namely Kanishka and Muthukumaran on the file

of the Family Court, Madurai.

5.As on date GWOP No.845 of 2019 and HMOP No.729 of 2019 are

pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai. The suit in O.S.No. 69 of 2021

is pending on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Thirumayam

and the HMOP No.310 of 2019 seeking for restitution of conjugal rights is

pending on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that O.S. No.

69 of 2021 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Thirumayam

is a suit between the parties to marriage with respect to the properties namely the

jewels. Both the proceedings are arising out of matrimonial dispute. O.S.No. 69

of 2021 is a suit between the parties to the marriage in respect of properties. As

per explanation to Section 7(1)(c) of the Family Court Act, 1984 the Family

Court will have jurisdiction to decide the suit or proceedings between the parties

to a marriage with respect to the property of the parties. The learned counsel

would further submit that in order to avoid conflicting decision and avoid

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

multiplicity of proceedings and to have comprehensive trial and judgment it is

necessary that all the cases have to be tried before the one and same Court and

further since two cases are pending on the file of the Family Court, it would

appropriate in the interest of justice that HMOP No. 310 of 2019 on the file of

the Principal Subordinate Court, Pudukottai and O.S.No. 69 of 2021 pending on

the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Thirumayam have to be

transferred to the file of the Family Court, Madurai for joint trial.

7. The learned counsel would further submit that in matter relating to

Family issues, this Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court, has held that the

convenience of the wife has to be taken into consideration and thereby he would

pray that the direction may be issued to the concerned Court .

8. The learned counsel for the respondent in Tr CMP(MD) No.289 of 2021

would submit that if the suit in O.S.No. 69 of 2021 is transferred to the file of the

Family Court , the petitioner will be loosing the chance of appeal. The learned

counsel would further submit that the first respondent is pressing the petitioner to

hand over the key to him, however she is admanat and refusing to appear before

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

the Manager of the private locker house to open the locker and thereby

warranting the respondent to file a suit. He would also submit that the first

respondent is also having necessary proof to show that the jewels were purchased

by him when the parties were in Malaysia.

9. Mr.S.M.Anandhamuragan appearing for the respondent in TRCMP(MD)

No.489 of 2019 would submit that the petitioner has filed GWOP No.845 of 2019

the court has to take into consideration the convenience and welfare of the minor

children and he would also object for the transfer of the same and he would

submit that they are ready to bear the expenses.

10. In reply, Mr. Barathan the learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that it is not a case where there is dispute with regard to the identity of

jewels. There is a dispute with regard to the ownership of the jewels and

necessarily full fledged trial has to be conducted and the petitioner is prepared to

prove her case by adducing evidence that the jewels which are there in the locker

exclusively belongs to her having purchased by her parents. He would also

submit that two cases are pending before the Family Court Madurai and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

necessarily the other two case have also to be transferred to the file of the Family

Court Madurai. He would also submit that CRP(MD) No.641 of 2021 relating to

custody of the children is also pending before this Court.

11. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the

materials available on record.

12. HMOP No.729 of 2019 filed by the petitioner/ wife seeking for divorce

and GWOP No.845 of 2019 filed by the petitioner/wife for permanent custody of

the children are pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai. HMOP No.

310 of 2019 filed by the respondent/husband for restitution of conjugal rights is

pending on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai and O.S.No. 69 of

2021 filed by the respondent/husband for mandatory injunction is pending on the

file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam. All the

cases are arising out of matrimonial dispute between the one and the same parties.

Further as of now two cases among the four cases are pending on the file of the

Family Court, Madurai. The dispute is regarding ownership of the properties

between the parties to the marriage.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

13. As per Explanation 7(1)(a)(c) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the

Family Courts will have jurisdiction to decide the suit or proceedings between

the parties to marriage with respect to the properties of the parties.

14. It is useful to refer to Section 7(1)(a) Explanation C, which reads as

follows

"(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall

(a) have and exercise all the jurisdiction exercisable by any district Court or any subordinate civil Court under any law for the time being in force in respect of suits and proceedings of the nature referred to in the Explanation and ;

EXPLANATION : The suits and proceedings referred to in this sub section are suits and proceedings of the following nature, namely :-

(c) a suit or proceedings between the parties to a marriage with respect to the property of the parties or of either of them".

15. This Court is of the opinion that in order to avoid conflicting decisions

and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to deliver comprehensive judgments

all the cases have to tried together by one and the same Judge.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

16. At this juncture the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

a direction may be issued to the concerned Court to complete the trial within a

specified time as may be fixed by this Court and the parties will co-operate for

speedy disposal.

17. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also

considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side.,

HMOP No. 310 of 2019 pending on the file of the Principal Sub Court,

Pudukottai and O.S.No. 69 of 2021 pending on the file of the District Munsif

cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam is withdrawn and transferred to the

file of the Family Court, Madurai. The Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai and the

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam is directed to

transmit the papers to the file of Family Court,Madurai forthwith. The Family

Court, Madurai directed to dispose of the transferred HMOP No. 310 of 2019

and O.S.No. 69 of 2021 along with HMOP No.729 of 2019 and GWOP NO.845

of 2019 within a period of nine months subject to further orders in CRP(MD) No.

641 of 2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

18. In the result, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. No

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.


                                                                               22.09.2021
                 Internet : Yes / No
                 Index    : Yes / No
                 aav

                 To:

                 1.The Family Court, Madurai

                 2.The Principal Sub Court, Pudukottai

3. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

aav

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.489 of 2019 and 289 of 2021 and

and 6209 of 2020

22.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter