Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Ascend Telecom ... vs The Superintendent Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 18100 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18100 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S.Ascend Telecom ... vs The Superintendent Of Police on 3 September, 2021
                                                                            Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 03.09.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                            Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021

                     M/s.Ascend Telecom Infrastructure
                     Private Limited,
                     Represented by its Authorized Signatory,
                     Mr. Tamilselvan,
                     Old No.32, New No.54,
                     Butt Road, St. Thomas Mount,
                     Near Kathipara Junction,
                     Chennai – 600 016.                   ...          Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                     1. The Superintendent of Police,
                        Municipality campus,
                        Muthukadai, Ranipet – 632 401

                     2. The Inspector of Police,
                        Town Police Station,
                        Ranipet District.                 ...          Respondents

                     PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section
                     482 Cr.P.C to direct the respondents to provide police protection to the
                     petitioner company and its staff and subordinates to erect, commissioning
                     of equipments and to radiate the transmission tower at the lease site
                     situated at Arakkonam, Gandhi Nagar, Rathinam Street, New Block 13,
                     Old Block 2, Arakkonam Town, Arakkonam Taluk, Arakkonam
                     Registration District, Vellore Revenue District measuring to an extent of
                     2400 sq.ft.

                     Page No.1 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021




                                      For Petitioner     :     Mr.A.M.Venkata Krishnan

                                      For Respondents :        Mr.A.Damodaran,
                                                               Gov. Advocate (Crl.Side)

                                                      ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the

respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner company and

its staff and subordinates to erect, commissioning of equipments and to

radiate the transmission tower at the lease site situated at Arakkonam,

Gandhi Nagar, Rathinam Street, New Block 13, Old Block 2, Arakkonam

Town, Arakkonam Taluk, Arakkonam Registration District, Vellore

Revenue District measuring to an extent of 2400 sq.ft.

2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is engaged in the

business of Operation and Maintenance of Mobile phone towers across

India for all the mobile phone operators/service providers providing

broadband Internet services and other allied services. For the said

purpose, cell phone tower is going to be erected. The petitioner had also

entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the property and had

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021

taken steps to install the cell phone tower. Already, the Government of

Tamil Nadu has granted exemption to all the Telecom companies to

install the cell phone towers by virtue of Government Order passed in

G.O.Ms.No.2, dated 01.04.2002.

3.When the petitioner attempted to erect the cell phone tower,

some people with vested interest claiming to be neighbours have been

causing hindrance and preventing the workers from carrying out the

construction work. In this regard, the petitioner gave a complaint to the

2nd respondent on 15.09.2020, seeking police protection. However, the

2nd respondent had not acted upon the said complaint and therefore, the

present Petition has been filed.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit

that the issue involved in this petition is covered by the earlier Judgments

of this Court. The learned counsel brought to the notice of this Court the

order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.16618 of 2018 dt.28.06.2018.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021

5.It will be appropriate to extract the relevant portions of the order

in Crl.O.P.No.16618 of 2018, which is extracted hereunder:-

“2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's company had the contract agreement for installation of cell phone tower with M/s.Indus Towers Limited, a company registered under the provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1956. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that whenever the petitioner's company attempted to erect transmission cell phone tower, publics are causing interference. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that by order dated 05.03.2015, the Honourable First Bench of this Court, in W.P.Nos.24976 of 2008 and etc., batch, held that because of the advancement in the science, no one has prevented to erect cell phone towers. It is also submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint dated 24.02.2016 to the first respondent police seeking police protection, for which C.S.R.No.42 of 2016 and since the same has not been considered so far, he has come up with the present petition for the relief stated supra.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021

3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to send a fresh representation to the respondent and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to consider the representation to be submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.”

6.This Court has consistently taken the view that no one can be

prevented from erecting the cell phone towers on a mere apprehension

about the effect of radiation from the cell phone tower. The apprehension

does not have a scientific backing. Till a positive finding is given in this

regard, cell phone towers cannot be prevented to be installed on mere

apprehensions.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021

7.For the reasons stated above, there shall be a direction to the 2 nd

respondent police to provide police protection to the petitioner for

erection of the cell phone tower. The 2nd respondent police shall ensure

that the entire process goes on in a smooth manner, without giving raise

to any law and order problem.

8. This criminal original petition is disposed of with the above

direction.

03.09.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No sms To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Municipality campus, Muthukadai, Ranipet – 632 401

2. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Ranipet District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

sms

Crl.O.P.No.15519 of 2021

03.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter