Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Authorized Officer vs 2 M/S.Sri A.L.Kempe Gowda ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 17885 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17885 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021

Madras High Court
The Authorized Officer vs 2 M/S.Sri A.L.Kempe Gowda ... on 1 September, 2021
                                                                                   W.P.No.18297 of 2021

                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED:      01.09.2021

                                                             CORAM :

                                        THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                              AND
                                          THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
                                                    W.P.No.18297 of 2021

                     The Authorized officer
                     Central Bank of India
                     No.19-A M.G. Road
                     Hosur 635 109.                                          ...    Petitioner

                                   Vs

                     1     The Chief Judicial Magistrate
                           Krishnagiri Tamil Nadu

                     2     M/s.Sri A.L.Kempe Gowda Charitable Trust
                           Represented by its Trustees
                           No.5 Kempe Gowda Garden Kelamangalam road
                           Arasakppam Village Denkanikottai 635 107
                           Krishnagiri District                     ... Respondents


                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                     issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to
                     dispose of the application filed under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act on
                     29/10/2020 within a time frame.


                               For the Petitioner        :      Mr.M.L.Ganesh

                                                             *****


                     __________
                     Page 1 of 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               W.P.No.18297 of 2021




                                                         ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

In view of the order proposed to be made, no previous notice is

issued to the respondents.

2. The petitioner intends to proceed against the securities

furnished by the second respondent borrower under the Securitisation

and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security

Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner says that a request for

administrative assistance made under Section 14 of the Act to the first

respondent on October 29, 2020 has not yet been attended to.

3. It has been continuously pointed out by this court that

authorities in receipt of any request under Section 14 of the said Act

must attend to them with expedition. The very purpose of the Act of

2002 is to ensure that blocked finances are unblocked upon the

securities being sold. It is towards such end that certain official

functionaries have been given the authority to render administrative

assistance to a secured creditor under Section 14 of the Act. Indeed,

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.18297 of 2021

as noticed in several previous judgments of this court, Section 14 of

the Act does not conceive of any adjudicatory function. Certain

declarations have to be furnished by a secured creditor and the

authority in receipt of such request under Section 14 of the Act has

only to accept the declarations at face value without seeking to

ascertain the veracity thereof. The concerned official is required to

render expeditious assistance to enable the secured creditor to have

access to the security or to the documents pertaining to the security.

4. There is no doubt that the intervening second surge of the

pandemic prevented the first respondent from taking up the request of

the petitioner in right earnest.

5. W.P.No.18297 of 2021 is disposed of by requesting the first

respondent Magistrate to take up the petitioner's request under

Section 14 of the said Act and dispose of the same within a period of

four weeks of the receipt of a copy of this order. Usually, the

concerned official in receipt of a request under Section 14 of the Act

has to provide the assistance to the extent reasonable.

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.18297 of 2021

6. The petitioner will immediately forward copies of the petition

and this order to the respondents. There will be no order as to costs.

                                                                   (S.B., CJ.)      (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                             01.09.2021

                     Index : no
                     sra


                     To:

                     1     The Chief Judicial Magistrate
                           Krishnagiri Tamil Nadu




                     __________



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.18297 of 2021

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(sra)

W.P.No.18297 of 2021

01.09.2021

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter