Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17882 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021
T.C.A.No.39 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.09.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
T.C.A.No.39 of 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
MM Forgings Ltd.
Guindy House,
95, Anna Salai,
Chennai-32. ...
Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench
dated 12.08.2008 in ITA No.370/mds/2008 relating to the Assessment Year
2000-01.
For Appellant : Mr. Karthik Ranganathan
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr. M.P. Senthil Kumar
JUDGMENT
Page 1/4 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.39 of 2009
(Judgment was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) We have heard Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar, learned
counsel for the respondent/assessee.
2.The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for brevity) is directed against the order of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench dated 12.08.2008 in ITA
No.370/mds/2008 relating to the Assessment Year 2000-01.
3.The appeal was admitted on 04.03.2009 on the following substantial
question of law:
“1)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in quashing the order of the CIT passed under Section 263 by invoking the clause (c) to explanation on the presumption that the issue regarding the allowability of deduction under section 80I to the assessee in respect of the new unit of plant II for the eleventh assessment year 2000-01 was before CIT(A) for consideration?"
4.The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that
Page 2/4 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No.39 of 2009
the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the Low Tax
Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the
Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for
filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased to
Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this case is less than
the threshold limit.
5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal is
dismissed on account of the Low Tax Effect. The substantial question of law
framed is left open. In the event the tax effect in this case is above the
threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue
to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided
on merits. No costs.
(T.S.S., J.) (S.S.K., J.)
01.09.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes /No
Sgl/mka
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.
and
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
Page 3/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
T.C.A.No.39 of 2009
Sgl/mka
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, “B” Bench.
T.C.A.No.39 of 2009
01.09.2021
Page 4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!