Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramalakshmi vs K.Sankaranarayanan
2021 Latest Caselaw 17872 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17872 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021

Madras High Court
Ramalakshmi vs K.Sankaranarayanan on 1 September, 2021
                                                                             S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 01.09.2021

                                                          CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                               S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

                     Ramalakshmi                                   ...Appellant

                                                           Vs

                     1.K.Sankaranarayanan

                     2.K.Ammaiyappan

                     3.K.Mariappan @ Jegajothi                    ...Respondents




                     Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
                     Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned
                     Principal District Judge Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur in A.S.No.
                     26 of 2011 dated 25.02.2013 reversing the judgment and decree passed in
                     O.S.No.139 of 2008 dated 30.03.2011 on the file of Subordinate Judge,
                     Srivilliputhur.


                                          For Appellant    : Mr.M.Ashok Kumar
                                          For Respondents : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu



                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

                                                         JUDGEMENT

The plaintiff in O.S.No.139 of 2008 on the file of the Sub-Court,

Sriviliputhur, is the appellant in this second appeal. The Suit was for

recovery of a sum of Rs.2,63,333/- with interest from the defendants. The

suit was filed on the basis of Ex.A1 pro-note dated 21.01.2006. The plaintiff

also stated that the defendants have executed the mortgaged deed dated

11.10.2001 (Ex.A6) for a sum of Rs. 30.000/-. The trial Court by judgment

and decree dated 30.03.2011 decreed the suit as prayed for. Aggrieved by

the same, the defendants filed A.S.No.26 of 2011, before the Principal

District Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur. By judgment and decree

dated 25.02.2012, the decision of the trial Court was reversed and the

appeal was allowed and the suit was dismissed. Challenging the same, the

second appeal came to be filed.

2.The learned counsel on either side informed the Court that the issue

has been amicable settled between the parties. In the meantime, the first

respondent K.Sankaranarayanan passed away. His wife had pre-deceased

him and they did not have any children. There is no question of impleading

the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent because his

brothers/respondents 2 and 3 are already on record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

3.The appellant/Ramalakshmi and her husband R.Gopalakrishnan are

present before this Court. The respondents 2 and 3 also present before this

Court. The respective counsel are also present before this Court.

4.The appellant/Ramalakshmi informed the Court that she had agreed

to accept a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- towards full and final settlement of all

other claims against the respondents. The amount of Rs.1,75,000/- is

presently with Advocate Ravikumar. He is having a sum of Rs.75,000/- in

the form of Demand Draft and remaining amount of Rs.1,00,000/- in cash.

The counsel on either side informed the Court that the appellant can receive

the entire amount of Rs.1,75,000/- from the said Ravikumar this evening

itself i.e on 01.09.2021. Ramalakshmi further undertakes that the Ex.A6 will

be cancelled by her.

5.Ramalakshmi further informed the Court that Ex.A6 mortgage deed

executed by the defendants in her favour can be treated as cancelled.

Originally she stated that she would go to the office of the Sub-Registrar for

executing the cancellation deed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

6.In view of the submission made by her in-person before me, I

declare that Ex.A6 dated 11.10.2001 stands cancelled. It is open to the

respondents 2 and 3 herein to have this order registered so that the same will

be duly reflected in the register of encumbrance.

7.The appellant and respondents 2 and 3 reduced the terms of

compromise in writing also. Since the same is in Tamil, the same was taken

on record but not as part of the decree.

8.The appellant will also issue after receiving receipt Rs.1,75,000/-

from Advocate Ravikumar.

9.With the above directions, this second appeal is disposed of. No

Costs.

01.09.2021

tta Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

To

1.The learned Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur.

2.The learned Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.,

tta

S.A(MD).No.556 of 2013

01.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter