Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Joseph Brito vs K.Mohammed Abbal Kaisor
2021 Latest Caselaw 23198 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23198 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2021

Madras High Court
S.Joseph Brito vs K.Mohammed Abbal Kaisor on 26 November, 2021
                                                                             C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 26.11.2021

                                                      CORAM :

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

                                            C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012

                  1.S.Joseph Brito
                  2.J.Saroja                                  ...Appellants/Petitioners


                                                        Vs.

                  1.K.Mohammed Abbal Kaisor
                  2.The Branch Manager
                    Bajaj Alliance General Assurance Company Ltd.,
                    12-G, Ram Nagar, Bye-Pass Road,
                    Madurai.                               ...Respondents/Respondents


                  PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 173 of
                  M.V.Act, 1988, to modify the judgment and decree, dated 24.06.2011 made
                  in MCOP.No.169 of 2009 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal
                  (Additional District Court/Fast Track Court No.II), Thoothukudi.


                                       For Appellants : Mr.S.Siva Thilakar
                                       For R-1        : No Appearance
                                       For R2         : Mr.J.S.Murali
                                       For R3         : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan



                 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012


                                                    JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to modify the judgment

and decree, dated 24.06.2011 made in MCOP.No.169 of 2009 on the file of

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court/Fast Track Court

No.II), Thoothukudi.

2. It is a case of fatal accident, which took place on 02.01.2009 at

about 12.00 hours, the deceased Melegon was sitting on the three wheel

cycle, which was stopped on the west side of the Tiruchendur to

Kulasekarapattinam near Allanthalai bus stop. At that time, the driver of the

first respondent's bus, bearing Registration No.TN-23-AD-3890, came on the

same road from south to north, driven by its driver in a high speed without

control, in rash and negligent manner and dashed against the deceased. As a

result of which, the deceased fell down and sustained head injuries and

multiple fractures all over the body and died on the spot and FIR has been

registered in Cr.No.3/09 under Section 279, 337 and 304(A) IPC against the

first respondent's driver.

3. The claimants have filed a petition in M.C.O.P.No.169 of 2009 on

the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012

Court/Fast Track Court No.II), Thoothukudi, seeking compensation.

4.Before the Tribunal, on the side of the appellants/claimants two

witnesses were examined as P.W.1 and P.W.2 and four documents were

marked as Exs.P.1 to P.4. On the side of the respondents one witness was

examined as R.W.1 and two documents were marked as Ex.R1 and Ex.R2.

5.The Tribunal, after considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidences and the arguments of the counsel for the appellants and

respondents and also on appreciating the evidences on record, held that the

accident occurred only, due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of

the first respondent's bus and directed the first respondent to pay a sum of

Rs.2,46,500/- as compensation.

6.Against which, the appellants/petitioners have filed this present

appeal to modify the judgment and decree passed by the Tribunal.

7.Eventhough, paper publication was effected no one appeared for the

first respondent. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and

the learned counsel appearing for the second and third respondents and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012

perused the materials available on record.

9.The learned counsel appearing for the third respondent has filed a

Memo stating that the Insurance Company have no objection in allowing the

appeal of the claimants to the extent of Rs.2,00,000/- with interest at the rate

of 7.5% pa., from the date of filing of the claim petition with a further

direction to recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle in the same

execution proceedings, for which, the appellants / claimants have no

objection.

10.Recording such undertaking given by the learned counsels

appearing on either side, this Court has no hesitation in allowing the appeal.

Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed and the

amount of Rs.2,46,500/- awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims

Tribunal(Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court No.II), Thoothukudi, is

reduced to Rs.2,00,000/-. The appellants are entitled to get Rs.2,00,000/-

(Rupees Two lakhs only) with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a., from the date

of claim petition till the date of realization. Except the above, all the other

terms of the award passed by the Tribunal is confirmed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012

11.The third respondent is directed to deposit the award amount, now

fixed by this Court, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of

a copy of this order, if not already deposited. On such deposit, the

appellants/claimants are permitted to withdraw the same, by filing necessary

application before the Tribunal. If the entire award amount is already paid by

the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company is permitted to withdraw the

excess amount with accrued interest. No Costs.

26.11.2021

Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsd

Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court/Fast Track Court No.II), Thoothukudi.

2. The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012

S.ANANTHI, J.

vsd

Judgment made in C.M.A.(MD)No.400 of 2012

26.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter