Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22657 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2021
W.A(MD)No.1210 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 18.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
and
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
W.A(MD)No.1210 of 2013
and
M.P(MD)No.2 of 2013
The Panchayat President,
Ayacode Village Panchayat,
Cherupaloor Post,
Kanyakumari District. ... Appellant / 2nd Respondent
Vs.
1.L.Rameshkumar ... 1st Respondent / Petitioner
2.The District Collector,
Nagercoil,
Kanyakumari District. ... 2nd Respondent / 1st Respondent
PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act,
against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.13589 of 2011, dated
01.03.2013.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.1210 of 2013
For Appellant : Mr.A.Saravanan
For R1 : Mr.D.Anbarasu
For R2 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan,
Spl.Govt.Pleader
JUDGMENT
S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.
and DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
The Writ Appeal has been filed against the order passed by this Court
in W.P.(MD)No.13589 of 2011, dated 01.03.2013.
2. On perusal of records, we noticed that there is fabrication of
records to get employment, which fact was not brought to the light of the
learned Single Judge. On 29.10.2021, the Tahsildar has filed a report, for
which, the writ petitioner's counsel wanted to file a reply. Today, no reply
has been filed and the junior Advocate on record sought time on the ground
that the Senior Counsel is not well. When we pointed out that the
document is fabricated and in case, we hold that it is a fabrication of
records by the writ petitioner in collusion with the then Panchayat
President, who has been now re-elected as President of the same
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1210 of 2013
Panchayat, both of them will be taken to task and the Court may invoke
Section 191 IPC., r/w Sections 195 and 349 Cr.P.C., to proceed against both
the parties. At the request of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner,
the matter was passed over to the afternoon session. When the matter is
called in the afternoon session, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner /
1st respondent submits that he is not pressing the relief sought in the Writ
Petition in W.P(MD)No.13589 of 2011 and the same may be recorded.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing
for the writ petitioner / 1st respondent, the Writ Appeal is allowed and the
order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.13589 of 2011, dated
01.03.2013 is set aside. No costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
[S.V.N.,J.] [G.J.,J.]
18.11.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
MPK
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1210 of 2013
To
1.The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1210 of 2013
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.
and DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
MPK
ORDER MADE IN
W.A(MD)No.1210 of 2013
18.11.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!