Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Vedagiri vs Union Of India Rep. By
2021 Latest Caselaw 22462 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22462 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2021

Madras High Court
V.Vedagiri vs Union Of India Rep. By on 16 November, 2021
                                                                                 Crl.O.P.No.19965 of 2017 &
                                                                          Crl.M.P.Nos.12046 & 12047 of 2017

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    Dated: 16.11.2021

                                                         Coram:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                              Crl.O.P.No.19965 of 2017 and
                                            Crl.M.P.Nos.12046 & 12047 of 2017

                V.Vedagiri                                                 ...Petitioner

                                                           Vs

                1. Union of India rep. by
                   Chief Health Inspector and
                   Food Inspector,
                   Egmore Railway Station,
                   Southern Railway, Chennai – 600 008.

                2. The Chief Medical Superintendent,
                   (Local Health Authority), Railways,
                   Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.                              ...Respondents

                PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal
                Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to SMMF No.1 of 2008 on the file
                of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai – 600 003 and quash the same.

                                   For Petitioner   : Mr.K.Balaji

                                   For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ram Kumar,
                                                     Standing Counsel for Railways

                Page 1 / 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   Crl.O.P.No.19965 of 2017 &
                                                                            Crl.M.P.Nos.12046 & 12047 of 2017

                                                     ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in SMMF.No.1of 2008

on the file of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai as against the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the

third accused in the above case and as against the second and fourth accused, this

Court has already quashed the proceedings in Crl.O.P.No.17931 of 2017 on

31.08.2017 and in Crl.O.P.No.3 of 2009 on 06.01.2009 and hence, the charges

against the petitioner has also to be quashed.

3. The petitioner along with other accused have been prosecuted for

violating the mandatory provisions of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and

this Court has quashed the proceedings against the A2, who is a manufacturer and

A4, who is a licensee and the same benefit has to be extended to the present

petitioner.

Page 2 / 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19965 of 2017 & Crl.M.P.Nos.12046 & 12047 of 2017

4. This Court while quashing the charge against A2 manufacturer in

Cr.O.P.No.3 of 2009 on 22.03.2017 relying on the judgment of High Court of

Himachal Pradesh in the matter of Rattan Lal Vs. Sate of Himachal Pradesh

reported in FAC 1991 [I] 179 has held that it is incumbent upon the authorities

concerned to have the samples analyzed and the prosecutions launched with

inordinate delay taking the accused right to get the sample tested from the Director

of Central Food Laboratory would tantamount to denial of his valuable and

mandatory right under section 13 [2] of the Act and delay in such matters against

the express mandatory provisions made in law and the Rules have to be tested with

full deference and cannot be given a go-by in a light-hearted fashion and quashed

the charges against A2 and subsequently, based on the above Order, in

Crl.O.P.No. 17931 of 2017 on 31.08.2017, the charges against A4, who is a

licensee, has also been quashed.

5. Considering the above and as the charges against the manufacturer and

the licensee have already been quashed, the petitioner, who is A3 and who is a

distributor is also entitled to such a benefit and the charges against the petitioner

are liable to be quashed.

Page 3 / 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19965 of 2017 & Crl.M.P.Nos.12046 & 12047 of 2017

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the

proceedings in SMMF.No.1of 2008 on the file of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate,

Chennai as against the petitioner is quashed. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petitions are closed.


                                                                                           16.11.2021

                vrc/kbs

                Index      : Yes
                Internet   : Yes
                Speaking Order

                To

                1. The XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
                   Ripon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003.

                2. The Chief Health Inspector and
                   Food Inspector,
                   Egmore Railway Station,

Southern Railway, Chennai – 600 008.

3. The Chief Medical Superintendent, (Local Health Authority), Railways, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

Page 4 / 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19965 of 2017 & Crl.M.P.Nos.12046 & 12047 of 2017

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vrc/kbs

Crl.O.P.No.19965 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.12046 & 12047 of 2017

16.11.2021

Page 5 / 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter