Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22205 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2021
S.A.No.318 of 2002
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.No.318 of 2002
and
C.M.P.No.2592 of 2002
M.Subramania Goundar ... Appellant
-vs-
1. Ramayee Ammal
2. K.Subramania Goundar ... Respondents
(Second respondent Ex-parte,
in the Court below. No batta
is necessary)
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the
judgment and decree dated 28.2.2001 passed by the learned Principal
Subordinate Judge, Dindigul as confirmed in A.S.No.79 of 1999 on his file
on appeal from the judgment and decree dated 27.2.98 made in O.S.No.1060
of 1994 passed by the I Additional District Munsif, Dindigul.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar
for Mr.M.V.Krishnan
For Respondents : No appearance
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.318 of 2002
JUDGMENT
The present Second Appeal has been filed by the first defendant in
O.S.No.1060 of 1994 on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif,
Dindigul, for recovery of money. The suit was decreed. The first defendant
preferred an appeal in A.S.No.79 of 1999 before the Principal Subordinate
Court, Dindigul. The first appeal was dismissed on 28.2.2001. As against
which, the present Second Appeal has been filed.
2. Pending Second Appeal, the first respondent in the appeal, who is
the decree holder/plaintiff had passed away and no steps have been taken so
far. Since no steps have been taken pending Second Appeal, the Second
Appeal was dismissed on 15.04.2014 as against the first respondent. So far,
no steps have been taken to restore the appeal as against the first
respondent/decree holder, even for the past seven years.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.318 of 2002
3. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently
the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
11.11.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
ebsi
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1. The I Additional District Munsif, Dindigul.
2. The Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.318 of 2002
R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.
ebsi
S.A.No.318 of 2002 and C.M.P.No.2592 of 2002
11.11.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!