Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5635 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2021
A.S.(MD).No.12 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
A.S.(MD).No.12 of 2014
and
M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014
Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam Tirupparaithurai
A registered Society,
Represented by its Secretary, Tirupparaithurai,
Tiruchirappalli Taluk,
Trichirappalli District. : Appellant / 1st Defendant
Vs.
The Idols of Sri Muthalamman and Sri Malai Tambiran at Kodangipatti
represented by their Hereditary Trustees.
1.Gunasekaran
2.Palaniswamy : 1st and 2nd Respondents / Plaintiffs
3.Sri.Swami Athamananda
4.Smt.Paranjothiammal
5.Machammal
6.The Commissioner,
HR & CE, Chennai,
having office at Chennai-34.
7.The Joint Commissioner,
HR & CE, Tiruchirappalli, having Office at Trichy-6.
8.The Registrar,
Bharathidasan University,
Tiruchirappalli,
having Office at Tiruchirappalli-24. : Respondents 3 to 8 /
Defendants 2 to 7
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
A.S.(MD).No.12 of 2014
Prayer : Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure
praying to set aside the decree and judgment 16.12.2013 made in O.S.No.
22 of 2005, on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Karur.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj
For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.M.P.Senthil
For R-3 : Dispensed with
For R-4 & R-5 : Mr.M.R.Srinivasan
For R-6 & R-7 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah
Additional Government Pleader
For R-8 : Mr.A.L.Kannan
********
JUDGMENT
***********
This Appeal has been filed as against the finding of the Court
below in decreeing the suit for recovery of possession.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that
now the appellant has approached the Department for fresh lease in
respect of 50 acres of land and the Department has conducted an
inspection and also demarcated the area to be leased to the appellant. It
is further submitted by the appellant that nothing further is required to be
tried in this appeal.
http://www.judis.nic.in A.S.(MD).No.12 of 2014
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for
the appellant, the appeal stands dismissed. It is for the appellant to work
out their remedy before the concerned Department and expedite the
proceedings before the Department for fresh lease. No costs.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
03.03.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
tsg
To
1.The Principal District Judge, Karur.
2.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
http://www.judis.nic.in A.S.(MD).No.12 of 2014
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J
tsg
Judgment made in A.S.(MD).No.12 of 2014
Dated: 03.03.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!