Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12689 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2021
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3655 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.06.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3655 of 2018
and C.M.P.No.20352 of 2018
A.V.S.Balaji ... Petitioner
Vs.
A.Parasuraman ... Respondent
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil
Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, to set aside the judgment
decree dated 04.07.2018 passed in R.C.A.No.458 of 2015 on the file of the
VII Small Causes Court, Chennai confirming the judgment and decree dated
20.07.2016 made in R.C.O.P.No.362 of 2015 on the file of the XII Small
Causes Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Laxmi Raj Rathnam
For Respondent : Mr. P.Rajendrakumar
Page 1 of 4
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3655 of 2018
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the
order dated 04.07.2018 passed by the learned VII Judge, Small Causes
Court, Chennai, in R.C.A.No.458 of 2015, confirming the order dated
20.07.2016 passed by the learned XII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai
in R.C.O.P.No.362 of 2015, thereby evicting the petitioner from the petition
premises.
2. The petitioner is the tenant and the respondent is the landlord.
The respondent filed petition in R.C.O.P.No.362 of 2015 as against the
petitioner for eviction and handed over the vacant possession. The learned
Rent Controller by an order dated 20.07.2016 directed the petitioner to
vacate the petition premises and handed over the vacant possession to the
respondent within a period of two months. Aggrieved by the same the
petitioner filed appeal before the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority
in R.C.A.No.458 of 2016 and the same was dismissed on 04.07.2018 by
confirming the order passed by the learned Rent Controller. Aggrieved by
the same the present Civil Revision Petition.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3655 of 2018
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel appearing on either side submitted that the petitioner vacated the
petition premises and handed over the vacant possession to the respondent.
Therefore, the revision petition has become infructuous and nothing survive
in this petition.
4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
Infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
29.06.2021 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order rts To
1. The VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
2. The XII Judge Small Causes Court, Chennai.
3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3655 of 2018
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
rts
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3655 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.20352 of 2018
29.06.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!