Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Balasubramanian vs The Additional Chief Secretary To ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 12616 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12616 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2021

Madras High Court
M.Balasubramanian vs The Additional Chief Secretary To ... on 29 June, 2021
                                                                     W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 29.06.2021

                                                   CORAM:

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                    AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI


                                            W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021


                M.Balasubramanian                                    : Appellant
                                                     Vs.

                1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Govt.,
                   Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
                      (EII-I) Department,
                   Secretariat,
                   Fort St.George,
                   Chennai – 600 009.


                2.The Secretary to Government,
                   Industries and Commerce Department,
                   Secretariat,
                   Fort St. George,
                   Chennai – 600 009.


                3.The Industries Commissioner and
                      Director of Industries and Commerce,
                   Chepauk,
                   Chennai – 600 005.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                1/7
                                                                                    W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021




                4.The General Manager,
                   District Industries Centre,
                   High Ground,
                   Palaymkottai,
                   Tirunelveli – 11.                                               : Respondents



                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against

                the order dated 16.08.2018 made in W.P.(MD)No.4116 of 2011, on the file

                of this Hon'ble Court and allow this Writ Appeal.

                                            For Appellant      : Mr.K.Gurunathan
                                            For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran
                                                                Standing Counsel for Government


                                                         JUDGMENT

*************** [Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

By consent of both parties, the appeal itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.Heard Mr.K.Gurunathan, learned Counsel appearing for the

appellant and Mr.R.Baskaran, learned Standing Counsel for Government

appearing for the respondents.

3.This appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the order

dated 16.08.2018 made in W.P.(MD)No.4116 of 2011.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021

4.The appellant filed the writ petition to quash the order passed

by the first respondent dated 19.11.2009 and for a direction to pay all

service benefits to the appellant with all backwages arrears of salary with

interest in the light of G.O.[3D]No.3, Small Industries (E.II 1)

Department, dated 17.03.2005. The writ petition was dismissed noting

the undisputed fact that the appellant has resigned from service. The

Court has also noted that though the issue regarding the regularisation

was pending before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in T.A.No.514

of 1989 and though direction was issued to the Government to regularise

the services of the appellant and others, the appellant had resigned from

service on 29.06.2016, much prior to the order of the Tribunal and much

prior to the order of the Government in G.O.No.3 dated 17.03.2005,

regularising the services. Further more, in the said Government order, it

has been specifically noted that the appellant has resigned from service.

In such circumstances, the learned Single Bench was right in concluding

that resignation would forfeit all service benefits accruing to an

employee.

5.Learned Counsel for the appellant would submit that the

resignation submitted by the petitioner is on account of his health

condition and unable to discharge his duties and the case of the appellant

requires sympathetical consideration and he is not only suffering from

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021

health condition and also suffering monetarily and his wife is also

suffering from illness. The learned Counsel has referred to the decision

of the Hon'ble Division Bench in the case of M.K.Sivakami Vs. Hon'ble

Principal District Judge reported in (2017) 4 MLJ 329.

6.We have heard Mr.R.Baskaran, learned Government Counsel

appearing for the respondents on the above submission. As noted above,

resignation would forfeit all service benefits. Therefore, the petitioner

cannot claim as a matter of right that he is to be extended all benefits

pursuant to the said Government Order. The Hon'ble Division Bench in

M.K.Sivakami's case [referred supra] has observed that in cases where

Government servants were discharged due to abolition of post / service,

compensation pension becomes payable as per Rules 38 and those who

tendered resignations due to their health conditions, deserve more

compassion than those who were inflicted with severe punishment of

dismissal or removal from service for proven misconduct on their part.

Therefore, the Hon'ble Division Bench opined that Rule 40 of the Tamil

Nadu Pension Rules requires modification by providing thereunder for

payment of compassionate allowance even in cases where government

servants tender resignation all due to grounds of ill health. Therefore,

certain recommendations were made by the Government.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021

7.It appears that the recommendations / observations made by

the Hon'ble Division Bench has not fructified into any amendment in the

Rules nor any Government Order has been issued. Further, it would be

always open to the petitioner to approach the Government to seek for

relaxation of the condition, taking note of the peculiar problem faced by

the appellant. Thus, while confirming the order passed by the learned

Writ Court, we grant liberty to the appellant to submit a representation to

the concerned authorities, requesting that his case may be treated

differently with a compassionate view and an admissible relief may be

extended. If such representation is given the appropriate authority shall

consider the same preferably within three [3] months from the date on

which the representation is made.

8.Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of. However,

there shall be no order as to costs.

                                                               [T.S.S., J.]   &      [S.A.I., J.]
                                                                       29.06.2021
                Index              : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No
                MR




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                                                                       W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021




Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Govt., Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (EII-I) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Secretary to Government, Industries and Commerce Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

3.The Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

4.The General Manager, District Industries Centre, High Ground, Palaymkottai, Tirunelveli – 11.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.

AND S.ANANTHI, J.

MR

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD)No.192 of 2021

29.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter