Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12582 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2021
S.A. No..684 of 1998
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A. No.684 of 1998
S.K.Mariapppan (died)
2. C.Saraswathy
3. M.Senthilkumar ... Appellant
(Appellants 2 & 3 brought on record
as legal heirs of the deceased sole
appellant vide order of court dated
20.12.2019 made in CMP No.15071,
15075 & 15077/2019 in SA No.684/1998)
Vs
1. T.G. Srinivasan (died)
2. Swaminathan (died)
3. Parvathi (died)
4. Rajagopalan
5. Parasakthi
(R-5 brought on record as sole legal heir
of the deceased 3rd respondent vide order
dt.13.06.2000 made in
CMP No.15287 of 1999)
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
S.A. No..684 of 1998
6. Smt.Palaniammal
7. Smt.Dhanalakshmi
8. Selvi Ramani
9. Smt. Kalaivani
10.Smt.Maheswari
(R6 to R10 brought on record as legal heirs
of the deceased 2nd respondent Swaminathan
vide order dt.18.06.2004 made in
CMP No.4532 of 2004)
11. S.kamal
12.S.Ramachandran
13.S.Malathi
14.S.Nagarajan ... Respondents
(R11 to R14 brought on record as
LRs of the deceased 1st
respondent Srinivasan vide order
of court dated 11.06.2019 made in
CMP No.78 to 80/2012 in SA
No.684/1998)
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
S.A. No..684 of 1998
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the
judgment and decree dated 20.10.1997 passed in A.S.No.12 of 1997 on the
file of the Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam by modifying the
judgment and decree dated 30.08.1996 passed in O.S.No.70 of 1988 on the
file of of the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.R.T.Doraisamy for
R5 to R10
JUDGMENT
As seen from the earlier proceedings of this court dated 21.06.2021,
there was no representation on the side of the appellant on that date and this
Court directed the Registry to post the matter under the caption “For
dismissal” today.
2. Today also, there is no representation on the side of the appellant.
However, the learned counsel for the respondents 5 to 10 is present. The
Second Appeal is of the year 1998. No further indulgence can be shown to
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ S.A. No..684 of 1998
the appellant. It can now be inferred that the Appellant is not interested in
prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution. No costs.
28.06.2021 rgr Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ S.A. No..684 of 1998
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
rgr
S.A. No.684 of 1998
28.06.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!