Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12456 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
CRL.O.P No.14 of 2018
and
Crl.M.P Nos.2 & 3 of 2018
P.Mylswami ...Petitioner
Vs.
The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Tiruppur,
Crime No.1 of 2002 .. Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records in C.C.No.125
of 2017 on the file of the learned learned Judicial Magistrate-I,
Udumalpet and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jayakumar
For Respondent : Mr.E.Pratap
Government Advocate
(Crl. side)
ORDER
This petition has been filed challenging the proceedings initiated
by the respondent against the petitioners under Sections 468, 471, 477
and 409 of IPC.
2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all
factual in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court
cannot decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of
Criminal Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioners to raise all the
grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its
own merits and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to
interfere with the proceedings pending before the Court below.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court to
dispense with the presence of the petitioner. Taking into consideration,
the facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioner is
dispensed with and they shall be represented by a counsel, who shall
cross examine the witnesses on the same day, they are examined in
Chief. The petitioner shall be present before the Court below at the time
of questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C and at the time of passing of the
final judgement.
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with
a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in CC No.125
of 2017 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy
of this order. The trial shall be conducted on a day to day basis in
accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported
in Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the
petitioner adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist
upon the presence of the petitioners and remand him to custody as
per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR
PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191).
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
25.06.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rli M.DHANDAPANI.J,
rli
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate-I, Udumalpet.
2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruppur,
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
CRL.O.P No.14 of 2018 and Crl.M.P Nos.2 & 3 of 2018
25.06.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!