Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12262 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2021
C.R.P (PD) No.2298 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
C.R.P (PD) No.2298 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.14352 of 2018
Jeyamani ... Petitioner
Vs.
The President,
Somayampalayam Panchayat,
Periyanayakanpalayam Union,
Rep.by Secretary Ananthakumar. ... Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil
Procedure Code, to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the
judgment and decretal order dated 07.04.2018 in I.A.No.647 of 2017 in
O.S.No.291 of 2014 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate
Judge of Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.Selvarajan for
Mr.R.Aranganathan
For Respondent : Mr.L.Mouli
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
C.R.P (PD) No.2298 of 2018
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the fair and
decretal order passed in I.A.No.647 of 2017 in O.S.No.291 of 2014 dated
07.04.2018 on the file of the learned Second Additional Subordinate
Judge, Coimbatore, thereby allowing the petition to condone the delay in
filing the application to set aside the ex-parte decree.
2. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondent is the third
defendant. The petitioner filed the suit for declaration and bare injunction
in respect of the suit property. Thereafter, the respondent herein failed to
appear before the Trial Court and as such, he was set ex-parte and the
ex-parte decree was passed on 05.10.2016. Therefore, the respondent
filed a petition to set aside the ex-parte decree with a delay of 237 days.
3. On a perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the condone
delay petition, it reveals that the suit summons were served on the
assistant of the Panchayat president and the same was not informed to the
respondent. Therefore, he was not able to appear before the trial Court.
When the petitioner on the strength of the ex-parte decree with rowdy
elements attempted to enter into the suit property, the respondent came to
understand about the ex-parte decree. Therefore, the Court below rightly https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P (PD) No.2298 of 2018
allowed the petition to condone delay in filing the set aside the ex-parte
decree and this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order passed
by the Court below.
4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However,
the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit, within a period of six
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, the
connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
23.06.2021 kv
Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No To
1. The Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.
2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P (PD) No.2298 of 2018
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.
kv
C.R.P (PD) No.2298 of 2018
23.06.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!