Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.Rajamohan vs G.Subbarayan
2021 Latest Caselaw 12236 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12236 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2021

Madras High Court
D.Rajamohan vs G.Subbarayan on 23 June, 2021
                                                                                 C.R.P.(P.D).No.3683 of 2018

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                         DATED : 23.06.2021

                                                              CORAM

                                    THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                                  C.R.P.(PD) No. 3683 of 2018
                                                  and CMP No.20513 of 2018

                     D.Rajamohan                                     ...       Petitioner

                                                                Vs

                     G.Subbarayan                                    ...       Respondent

                     Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of
                     Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated
                     03.07.2018 made in I.A.No.152 of 2018 in O.S.No.680 of 2017 on the
                     file of the I Additional Sub Court, Villupuram.
                                        For Petitioner       : Mr.R.Gururaj
                                        For Respondent       : Mr.C.Munusamy
                                                              ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal

order dated 03.07.2018 made in I.A.No.152 of 2018 in O.S.No.680 of

2017 on the file of the I Additional Sub Court, Villupuram, thereby

allowing the petition for attachment before judgment in respect of leave

salary encashment.

2. The respondent filed a suit on the pro-note executed by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.R.P.(P.D).No.3683 of 2018

petitioner. While pending suit, the respondent filed a petition for

attachment before judgment under Order 38 Rule 5 of CPC read with

Section 151 of CPC. The respondent stated that the petitioner was

working as Junior Bailiff in the Principal District Court, Chidambaram

and he has about to retire from service on 30.06.2018. Therefore,

directed the petitioner to furnish security for a sum of Rs.2,72,692.50/-

failing which, the leave salary encashment has to be attached. Order 38

Rule 5 meant for the immovable property. It is relevant to extract the

provisions under Order 38 Rule 5, hereunder:-

“5. Where defendant may be called upon to furnish security for production of property :

(1) Where, at any stage of a suit, the Court is satisfied, by affidavit or otherwise, that the defendant, with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against him.

(a) is about to dispose of the whole or any part of his property, or

(b) is about to remove the whole or any part of his property from the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court, the Court may direct the defendant, within a time to be fixed by it, either to furnish security, in such sum as may be specified in the order, to produce and place at the disposal of the Court, when required, the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.R.P.(P.D).No.3683 of 2018

said property or the value of the same, or such portion thereof as may be sufficient to satisfy the decree, or to appear and show cause why he should not furnish security.

(2) The plaintiff shall, unless the Court otherwise directs, specify the property required to be attached and the estimated value thereof.

(3) The Court may also in the order direct the conditional attachment of the whole or any portion of the property so specified.

(4) If an order of attachment is made without complying with the provisions of Sub-rule(1) of this rule, such attachment shall be void.

3. Whereas in the present suit, the Court below attached the

leave salary encashment of the petitioner, that too before judgment.

Now, both the counsel on record represented that the main suit itself is

posted for arguments.

4. Considering the above, the order dated 03.07.2018 passed

by I Additional Sub Court, Villupuram in I.A.No.152 of 2018 in

O.S.No.680 of 2017, is hereby set aside and the Civil Revision Petition is

allowed. However, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.R.P.(P.D).No.3683 of 2018

that if the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the leave salary encashment,

nothing is available with the petitioner to recover the suit amount. The

learned counsel for the petitioner also undertakes that the petitioner shall

not withdraw the leave salary encashment, till the disposal of the suit.

The said undertaking is hereby recorded. The Court below is directed to

dispose of the application and also the main suit, within a period of three

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

23.06.2021

lpp Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No

To The I Additional Sub Judge, Villupuram

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.J, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.R.P.(P.D).No.3683 of 2018

lpp

C.R.P.(PD) No. 3683 of 2018 and CMP No.20513 of 2018

23.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter