Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tamil Nadu Thozil Nutpa vs The Executive Engineer
2021 Latest Caselaw 12067 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12067 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2021

Madras High Court
Tamil Nadu Thozil Nutpa vs The Executive Engineer on 21 June, 2021
                                                                        W.A.No.2555 of 2018

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 21.06.2021

                                                      CORAM

                                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
                                                      and
                                      THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

                                              W.A.No.2555 of 2018
                                           and C.M.P.No.20592 of 2018

                     1.Tamil Nadu Thozil Nutpa
                         Kalappaniyalar Sangam,
                       (Regd No.187/TVR2004),
                       No.4/30,D-II Street,
                       Ma.Po.Si.Nagar, Thiruvallur District,
                       Rep. by its General District Secretary,
                       Thiru C.Ramakrishnan

                     2.M.Natarajan                                           .. Appellants

                                                        Vs

                     1.The Executive Engineer,
                       Krishna Water Supply Projects
                        (KWSP) Division No.1
                       Public Works Department, W.R.O.,
                       Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

                     2.The Executive Engineer,
                       Krishna Water Supply Projects
                        (KWSP) Division No.1
                       Public Works Department, W.R.O.,
                       Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

                     3.The Superintending Engineer,
                       Palar Project,
                       Public Works Department, W.R.O.,
                       Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.                         .. Respondents

                     Page 1 of 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             W.A.No.2555 of 2018



                          Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
                     dated 11.10.2017 made in W.P.No.26599 of 2012.

                               For Appellants        :     Mr.P.Ganesan

                               For Respondents       :     No appearance

                                                      JUDGMENT

(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

This appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned

Single Judge, who while confirming the order impugned, dismissed the

writ petition on the ground that the Scheme having been completed

and in the absence of right vested, the relief sought for cannot be

granted.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that

though they are appointed as Non Muster Roll employees, they should

have been continued with the employment on consolidated pay.

Reliance has been made on Government Order (Standing) No.26

dated 01.03.2012 issued by the High Ways and Minor Harbors (H.M.2)

Department.

3. We do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the

learned Single Judge. The Government Order relied upon was in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.2555 of 2018

compliance of the order passed by this Court and, therefore, even the

said order shall not be quoted as a precedent. As per the law

governing the field in Uma Devi's case, the employment made by way

of back door entry on a casual temporary basis can never create an

interest in favour of such appointee. Admittedly, the members of the

first appellant's association have not completed ten years on the date

of the aforesaid judgment of the Constitution Bench. Thus, as rightly

held by the learned Single Judge, there is no right vested with them.

4. In such view of the matter, we do not find any error in the

order passed by the learned Single Judge warranting interference and

the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the

connected miscellaneous petition is closed. However, we make it clear

that the continuation of employment on temporary basis as NMRs will

not be a bar if such a necessity exists notwithstanding the order

passed by us.

                                                               (M.M.S., J.)    (R.N.M., J.)
                                                                       21.06.2021
                     Index:Yes/No
                     mmi/ssm







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.2555 of 2018

To

1.The Executive Engineer, Krishna Water Supply Projects (KWSP) Division No.1 Public Works Department, W.R.O., Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2.The Executive Engineer, Krishna Water Supply Projects (KWSP) Division No.1 Public Works Department, W.R.O., Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The Superintending Engineer, Palar Project, Public Works Department, W.R.O., Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.2555 of 2018

M.M.SUNDRESH, J.

and R.N.MANJULA,J.

mmi

W.A.No.2555 of 2018

21.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter