Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Sun Tv Pvt. Ltd vs M/S.Kairali Tv
2021 Latest Caselaw 12043 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12043 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S.Sun Tv Pvt. Ltd vs M/S.Kairali Tv on 21 June, 2021
                                                                   C.S.No.443 of 2005

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED : 21.06.2021

                                                  CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                             C.S.No.443 of 2005,
                                             O.A.No.533 of 2005
                                                    and
                                             A.No.3104 of 2006


                     M/s.SUN TV PVT. Ltd.,
                     Rep. by its Manager (Programming)
                     No.367-369, Anna Salai,
                     Teynampet,
                     Chennai – 600 018.                               ...Plaintiff
                                                     .Vs.
                     1.M/s.Kairali TV.,
                       Unit of Malayalam Communications Ltd.,
                       Rep. by its Managing Director,
                       Vadakkekottaram,
                       Padmavilasom Road, Fort P.O.
                       Tiruvananthapuram – 695 023
                       Kerala.

                     2.M/s.Gee Bee Videos
                       Rep. by its Proprietrix,
                       Flat No.B/1-C, Garden Court Apartments,
                       Aalinchuvadu, Palarivattom,
                       Cochin – 682 024
                       Kerala.

                     3.M/s.Vinodh Movies,

                     Page No.1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.S.No.443 of 2005

                        Rep. by its Proprietor
                        TDS Road,
                        Kochi – 682 035
                        Kerala.                                                 ... Defendants

                               Plaint filed under Section 55 and 56 of the Copy Right Act, 1957
                     and Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, 1956 read with Order
                     VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for:
                               a) declaring that the plaintiff is the owner of the entire Copy
                     Rights in the Cinematography film “Thekkekara Superfast” (Malayalam
                     Colour), starring M/s.Mukesh, Dileep, Harisree Ashokan, Jagathy, Rajan
                     P.Dev Gayatri, KPAC Lalitha & Others and directed by Thaha; inclusive
                     of the rights of Satellite Television Broadcast, Direct to Home Broadcast,
                     Direct Satellite Service, Terrestrial Television Broadcast and all other
                     rights connected therewith including exhibition of the film by means of
                     wireless diffusion and by wire for communication to the public through
                     Television Broadcast for the entire world;
                               b) consequential permanent injunction restraining the first
                     defendants, their men, agents, assignees or any other person or persons
                     claiming through them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's copy
                     rights in the Cinematography film “Thekkekara Superfast” (Malayalam
                     Colour), starring M/s.Mukesh, Dileep, Harisree Ashokan, Jagathy, Rajan
                     P.Dev Gayatri, KPAC Lalitha & Others and directed by Thaha; inclusive
                     of the rights of Satellite Television Broadcast, Direct to Home Broadcast,
                     Direct Satellite Service, Terrestrial Television Broadcast and all other
                     rights connected therewith including exhibition of the film by means of

                     Page No.2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                    C.S.No.443 of 2005

                     wireless diffusion and by wire for communication to the public through
                     Television Broadcast for the entire world and
                               c) directing the first defendant to pay costs.

                                     For Plaintiff        : Mrs.M.Sneha
                                                            for Mr.J.Ravindran

                                     For Defendants       : Mr.N.Srinivas Jayaprakash for D1

                                                           No appearance for D2 and D3

                                                       ********
                                                     JUDGMENT

The plaintiff has sued for the following reliefs:-

a) A declaration that the plaintiff is the owner of the entire Copy

Rights in the Cinematography film “Thekkekara Superfast” (Malayalam

Colour), starring M/s.Mukesh, Dileep, Harisree Ashokan, Jagathy, Rajan

P.Dev Gayatri, KPAC Lalitha & Others and directed by Thaha; inclusive

of the rights of Satellite Television Broadcast, Direct to Home Broadcast,

Direct Satellite Service, Terrestrial Television Broadcast and all other

rights connected therewith including exhibition of the film by means of

wireless diffusion and by wire for communication to the public through

Television Broadcast for the entire world;

Page No.3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.443 of 2005

b) consequential permanent injunction restraining the first

defendants, their men, agents, assignees or any other person or persons

claiming through them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's copy

rights in the Cinematography film “Thekkekara Superfast” (Malayalam

Colour), starring M/s.Mukesh, Dileep, Harisree Ashokan, Jagathy, Rajan

P.Dev Gayatri, KPAC Lalitha & Others and directed by Thaha; inclusive

of the rights of Satellite Television Broadcast, Direct to Home Broadcast,

Direct Satellite Service, Terrestrial Television Broadcast and all other

rights connected therewith including exhibition of the film by means of

wireless diffusion and by wire for communication to the public through

Television Broadcast for the entire world and

c) directing the first defendant to pay costs.

2. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the Producer of the movie

viz., M/s.Vinodh Movies assigned Satellite Rights (Television Rights) to

one M/s.Gee Bee Videos under the agreement dated 17.02.2004. The

said Gee Bee Videos viz., the 2nd defendant in turn assigned the rights to

Page No.4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.443 of 2005

the plaintiff under the agreement dated 18.03.2004. Therefore, the

plaintiff would claim that it is entitled to the copyright of the movie

“Thekkekara Superfast”.

3. The defence is that the original Producer viz.,M/s.Canary Films

had assigned the Satellite Rights to one M/s.Rappadi Release under the

agreement dated 07.05.2001 and the said M/s.Rappadi Release, the

assignee had parted with its rights in favour of M/s.Gayathri Release

under an agreement dated 12.01.2002. It is the further claim in defence

that the said M/s.Gayathri Release which is a Proprietary concern

assigned the rights to the 1st defendant on 08.04.2005. But, the name of

the movie in the two sets of agreement is different.

4. However, Mr.N.Srinivas Jayaprakash, learned counsel

appearing for the 1st defendant would now contend that the 1st defendant

viz., Kairali Television is not claiming any right over the movie as of

today since the term of its agreement is already over.

Page No.5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.443 of 2005

5. As adverted to there is no prayer for damages in the plaint.

Therefore, without going into the controversy as to whether both the

movies are same or not, the suit is disposed of solely on the ground that

the right assigned to the defendants had expired and the defendants no

longer claim right over the movie subject matter of the suit. There will

be no costs. It will be open to the plaintiff to establish its rights under

the agreement dated 18.03.2004 against any other person who claims any

right over the movie in question. In view of the disposal of the suit, the

application in A.No.3104 of 2021 will stand dismissed and the

application in O.A.No.533 of 2005 will stand closed.



                                                                                    21.06.2021


                     dsa

                     Index          : No

                     Internet       : Yes

                     Speaking order




                     Page No.6/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             C.S.No.443 of 2005

List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil

List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil

List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil

List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants: Nil

21.06.2021 dsa

Page No.7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.443 of 2005

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

C.S.No.443 of 2005

21.06.2021

Page No.8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter