Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Suresh vs The Chairman
2021 Latest Caselaw 11683 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11683 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Suresh vs The Chairman on 15 June, 2021
                                                                       W.A.(MD)No.405 of 2019

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 15.06.2021

                                                   CORAM:

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                     AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI


                                            W.A.(MD)No.405 of 2019
                                                     and
                                           C.M.P.(MD)No.3475 of 2021


                R.Suresh                                                 : Appellant
                                                      Vs.

                1.The Chairman,
                   Indian Space Research Organization,
                   Govt. of India Department of Space,
                   Antariksh Bhavan, New BEL Road,
                   Bangalore – 560 231.


                2.The Administrative Officer (Recruitment),
                   Liquid Propulsion System Centre,
                   (Presently ISRO Propulsion Complex),
                   Mahendragiri – 627 133.
                   Tirunelveli District.


                3.The Controller,
                   Liquid Propulsion System Centre,
                   Valiamala P.O.,
                   Thiruvananthapuram – 695 547.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                1/5
                                                                                W.A.(MD)No.405 of 2019




                4.The Administrative Officer (Recruitment),
                   Liquid Propulsion System Centre,
                   Valiamala P.O.,
                   Thiruvananthapuram – 695 547.


                5.Mamindla Sathish                                                : Respondents



                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent,

                praying to set aside the order dated 01.02.2019, in W.P.(MD)No.17424 of

                2014 and allow the Writ Petition.

                                   For Appellant          : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew
                                   For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.E.T.Rajendran
                                   For Respondent No.5    : Mr.S.Balaji


                                                  JUDGMENT

*************** [Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

We have heard Mr.M.Jerin Mathew, learned Counsel appearing

for the appellant, Mr.E.T.Rajendran, learned Counsel appearing for

respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.S.Balaji, learned Counsel appearing for the

fifth respondent.

2.This Writ Appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the

order dated 01.02.2019, in W.P.(MD)No.17424 of 2014.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.405 of 2019

3.The said writ petition was filed praying for issuance of Writ of

Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order passed by the third

respondent dated 27.03.2014 and for a consequential direction to the

fourth respondent to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post

of Technical Assistant (Civil), under priority category of member of a

family displaced on account of acquisition of land for the purpose of

forming the Liquid Propulsion System Centre in Tirunelveli District.

4.Before the learned Writ Court, it appears that arguments were

advanced based upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench in

W.A.Nos.2736 and 2737 of 2001. The learned Single Bench rightly

noticed that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the said judgment

cannot be treated as a precedent. However, the question is whether the

appellant had the right to seek for priority in the matter of grant of

employment, merely on the ground that he is a person who has lost his

land in the land acquisition proceedings for the project of the second

respondent. The respondent department had clearly stated that the lands

were secured as early as in 1980's, through the Government of Tamil

Nadu and suitable compensation from the funds of the Department of

Space has been paid and that the department has no direct contact with

the land owners and no assurance was given to any of them, including the

State Government authorities, to provide employment to the displaced

persons.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.405 of 2019

5.Further, the allegation made by the appellant that the

respondents have appointed several persons whose lands were secured

was denied as false. That apart, the delay in filing such a representation

was also held against the appellant. Further more, it was pointed out that

fulfillment of qualification prescribed for the particular post has to be

fulfilled and unless and until the recruitment is conducted, no

appointment can be made. The reasons assigned by the respondent

department is perfectly valid and the learned Single Bench rightly

rejected the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition. Thus, we find no good

grounds to interfere with the order passed by the learned Writ Court.

6.Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. However, there

shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous

Petition is closed.

                                                                      [T.S.S., J.]   &     [S.A.I., J.]
                                                                                15.06.2021
                Index              : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No
                MR

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.405 of 2019

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.

AND S.ANANTHI, J.

MR

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD)No.405 of 2019

15.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter