Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11509 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2021
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.827 & 828/2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:09.06.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.827 & 828 of 2021(NPD)
and
C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4462 & 4467 of 2021
Muthuram ... Petitioner in
both C.R.Ps.
Vs.
Pushbam ... Respondent in
both C.R.Ps.
COMMON PRAYER: Petitions filed under Section 115 of Civil
Procedure Code, to against the fair order and decreetal order dated
13.01.2020 passed in E.A.Nos.21 & 22 of 2018 in E.P.No.02 of 2016 in
O.S.No.17 of 2009 on the file of District Munsif Court cum Judicial
Magistrate Court No.1, Sattur.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi
(In both C.R.Ps)
For Respondent : Mr.M.Thirunavukarasu
(In both C.R.Ps)
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.827 & 828/2021
COMMON ORDER
These revision Petitions have been directed against the orders
passed by the Executing Court in E.A.Nos.21 & 22 of 2018 in E.P.No.02
of 2016 in O.S.No.17 of 2009, on the file of District Munsif Court cum
Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Sathur. The respondent herein filed the
said suit seeking relief of declaration and mandatory injunction. By
judgment and decree dated 05.10.2015, the suit was decreed. To execute
the same, E.P.No.02 of 2016 was filed. In the said Execution Petition,
petitioner herein filed two Execution Applications. One Execution
Application was for dismissing the Execution Petition itself. The other
Execution Application was for appointing an Advocate Commissioner.
Both Execution Applications have been dismissed by the impugned
orders. They are put to challenge in these Civil Revision Petitions.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner
reiterated all the contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds.
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.827 & 828/2021
3. I wanted to know whether the judgment and decree obtained by
the respondent in her favour has been put to challenge before any
appellate Court. The answer is in the negative. When the judgment and
decree is very much holding good and appears to have attained finality,
the Executing Court cannot go beyond the same. The Executing Court is
obliged to give effect to the judgment and decree that is sought to be
executed. It is not shown that the judgment and decree is a nullity. In
these circumstances, the orders passed by the Executing Court do not call
for any interference.
4. Accordingly, these Civil Revision petitions are dismissed. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
09.06.2021
Internet : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
vsm
To
The District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate Court No.1,
Sattur.
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.827 & 828/2021
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
vsm
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.827 & 828 of 2021(NPD)
09.06.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!