Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kadhersulthan vs Musabu Kani
2021 Latest Caselaw 11380 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11380 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 June, 2021

Madras High Court
Kadhersulthan vs Musabu Kani on 2 June, 2021
                                                                        S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021




                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED : 02.06.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                               S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021
                                                        and
                                        C.M.P.(MD).Nos.4382 and 4383 of 2021


                     Kadhersulthan                            : Appellant / Appellant / Plaintiff

                                                       Vs.

                     Musabu Kani                              : Respondent / Respondent /
                                                                                 Defendant

                                   PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. praying to
                     set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 05.03.2020 passed in A.S.No.09
                     of 2018, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Mudukulathur, confirming
                     the Judgment and Decree, dated 14.12.2017, passed in O.S.No.89 of
                     2013, on the file of the District Munsif Court,Mudukulathur.


                                   For Appellant              : Mr.T.Thirumurugan




                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                         S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021



                                                   JUDGMENT

***********

The plaintiff, who lost before both the Courts below, has filed

the present Second Appeal before this Court.

2. The appellant / plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of

possession against the respondent / defendant. The specific case of the

appellant is that the suit property originally belonged to his father

Bakeer Mohamad Rowthar and the same was settled in favour of the

respondent / defendant. The further case of the appellant is that by virtue

of this settlement, the other legal heirs were not given any property and

ultimately, the dispute was referred to the Jamath where a decision was

taken to cancel the document and the property was, thereafter, divided

among all the legal heirs. Since the appellant was not given possession

of his share of the property, the suit for recovery of possession has been

filed before the Court below.

3. Heard Mr.T.Thirumurugan, learned counsel appearing on

behalf of the appellant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021

4. Both the Courts below have categorically found that there is

no dispute with regard to the fact that the property originally belonged to

the father of the appellant. When he was alive, he had executed a

settlement deed in favour of the defendant on 05.04.1982, which was

marked as Ex.A.1. This settlement deed has not been put to challenge

and it has not been cancelled in the manner known to law. The appellant

has relied upon the decision taken by the Jamath and even if it is taken to

be true, such a decision only has a persuasive value and no Jamath can

cancel a registered document as claimed by the appellant.

5. The property being the exclusive property of the father of

the appellant, he had every right to deal with the same without any

restriction during his life time. Therefore, the Courts below have rightly

held that the respondent had become the absolute owner of the property

by virtue of Ex.A.1 and his title has not been challenged. The decision of

the Jamath marked as Ex.A.6, cannot nullify a valid registered document

and it has been rightly held so by both the Courts below.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021

6. In the considered view of this Court, there is absolutely no

substantial question of law involved in the present case and both the

Courts below have properly appreciated the oral and documentary

evidence while dismissing the suit filed by the appellant. This Court

cannot undertake to once again re-appreciate the evidence which will be

beyond the scope of a Second Appeal under Section 100 C.P.C.

7. In the result, this Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.




                                                                                     02.06.2021
                     Index    : Yes/No
                     Internet : Yes/No
                     tsg
                     To
                     1. The District Munsif, Mudukulathur.
                     2. The Sub Court, Mudukulathur.
                     3. The Record Keeper, V.R.Section,

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021

NOTE:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

tsg

Judgment made in S.A.(MD).No.324 of 2021

Dated:02.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter