Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15393 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2021
W.P.No.7914 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 31.07.2021
:CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.7914 of 2006
T. Subramaniyan .... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Government of India
Rep by its Secretary,
Ministry of Labour,
New Delhi.
2. The Assistant General Manager,
Indian Bank, Circle Office,
Jennie Plaza, 5-F, Bharathiyar Salai,
Contonment, Trichy - 1. ..... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to
issue a Writ or Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the order No. L.12012/103/2005-
IR(B-II) dated 11.11.2005, passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same and
consequently, direct the 1st respondent to refer the industrial dispute relating to non-
employment of petitioner for adjudication by a competent Labour Court/Tribunal.
For Petitioner : Mr.V. Ajay Khose
For R1 : Mr.K.Subbu Ranga Bharathi
For R2 : Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar
for M/s.Ayar & Dolia
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
W.P.No.7914 of 2006
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order
No.L.12012/103/2005-IR(B-II) dated 11.11.2005, passed by the 1st Respondent to refer
the industrial dispute, relating to non-employment of Petitioner for adjudication by a
competent Labour Court/Tribunal.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned
counsel for the Petitioner that the Government has declined to refer the dispute, on the
ground that the award passed by the Labour Court in I.D.No.556 oof 2001 was the
subject matter of the Writ Petition. It is further stated that W.P.No.32994 of 2002 was
disposed of directing the parties to work out the remedy before the appropriate Labour
Forum and that the matter pending in I.D.No.20 of 2017.
3. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
4. The Government have no power to decide the lis between the parties to the
dispute. The Government has to refer to the dispute for adjudication and cannot reserve
the adjudicatory role. I am of the view that the Government in declining to refer the
dispute is bad in the eye of the law. In the light of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in the case of M/s. Avon Services production Agencies (P) Ltd., Vs. Industrial https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.P.No.7914 of 2006
Tribunal, Haryana and others, reported in (1979) 1 SCC 1, even there are no fresh
materials, the Government has to refer the dispute of adjudication even when the
dispute is raised again on the same issue without additional materials. Hence the Writ
Petition is disposed of with the direction to the Government to refer the dispute for
adjudication within the period of two months from the date of the receipt to the order to
the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Madras and the said Tribunal is expected
to decide the issue within the period of six months from the date of receipt of the
reference as more than 15 years have gone by from the date of declining to refer the
dispute for adjudication. No Costs.
31.07.2021 Index: Yes / No Speaking order /Non speaking order shk/vm
To
1.The Secretary, Government of India Ministry of Labour, New Delhi.
2. The Assistant General Manager, Indian Bank, Circle Office, Jennie Plaza, 5-F, Bharathiyar Salai, Contonment, Trichy - 1.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.P.No.7914 of 2006
S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., shk
W.P.No.7914 of 2006
31.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!