Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15041 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021
C.S.No.137 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 27.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
C.S.No.137 of 2009
Dr.Chandrika Ayyar,
C/o.Me.S.Jagannathan,
New No.9 (Old No.4)
Jagadeeswaran Street,
T.Nagar,
Chennai – 600 017. .. Plaintiff
/versus/
1.D.Vijayabaskar,
S/o.Dhanapalaiya,
F-Block,
20/7, 4th Floor,
3rd Main Road,
Anna Nagar,
Chennai- 600 040.
2.P.Papayammal,
No.129/2B, “G” Block,
1st Main Road, 75/4,
Anna Nagar East,
Chennai-600 102. .. Defendants
This Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 Original Side
Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC, prayed for (a) For
Rs.10,00,000/- towards damages for defaming the reputation of the
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.S.No.137 of 2009
Plaintiff;
(b) For Rs.17,55,000/- towards loss of income caused by the
Defendants in preventing the sale transaction of the Plaintiff's property
and the unnecessary expenditure incurred by the Plaintiff towards
apartment rent;
(c) For permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their
men, Servants or agents from indulging in defamatory speech or
statements containing defamatory imputations against the plaintiff and
publicising the same;
(d) For a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their
men, Servants or agents from visiting and threatening her at her place of
residence or any other place where she stays and interfering with her
activities;
(e) Directing the Defendants to handover the original
documents detailed in para 9 of the Plaint and admitted by them to be in
their possession;
(f) Costs of the suit.
For plaintiff : Ms.G.Sumithra
For Defendants : Mr.C.Narayanan
Mr.M.Velmurugan
JUDGMENT
The suit is filed by one Chandrika Ayyar against the
defendants D.Vijayabaskar and P.Papayammal for damages caused due
to defaming her reputation and loss of income incurred due to act of the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.137 of 2009
defendants preventing her from entering the sale proceedings in respect
of the property.
2. The said Chandrika Ayyar died on 02.11.2015. Since the suit
is for damages caused due to defamation and other acts, the cause of
action dies with the person. It is also to be noted that the second class
heirs of Chandrika Ayyar, who entered appearance and got impleaded in
other connected suits, have chosen not to file any implead application.
3. For the above said reason, the suit is dismissed as abated.
There shall be no order as to costs.
27.07.2021
Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Index : yes/no rpl
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
rpl
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.137 of 2009
C.S.No.137 of 2009
27.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!