Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rita Jayaraj vs The Inspector Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 14892 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14892 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Rita Jayaraj vs The Inspector Of Police on 26 July, 2021
                                                           1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 26.07.2021

                                                       CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

                                                CRL.O.P No.5292 of 2018
                                                         and
                                            Crl.M.P Nos.2616 & 2617 of 2018

                     Rita Jayaraj                                            ...Petitioner
                                                          Vs.
                     1. The Inspector of Police,
                     DCB Kancheepuram.                               ....Respondent

                     2. Pushpa Anthony samy                          .. Respondent /
                                                                     Defacto Complainant

                     PRAYER :           Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
                     Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records and quash all
                     proceedings in CC.No.58/2016 on the file of the learned Judicial
                     Magistrate-II, Kanchipuram in Crime No.60/2013 on the file of the
                     Inspector of Police, DCB, Kancheepuram pending investigation before
                     the respondent police based on the complaint dated 11.05.2012.


                                      For Petitioner           : Mr.S.N.A.Hussainy
                                      For Respondent           : Mr.C.E.Pratap -         R1
                                                               For Public Prosecutor
                                                                 Mr.D.Murthy     -       R2



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                               2

                                                        ORDER

This petition has been filed challenging the proceedings initiated

by the respondent against the petitioner under Sections 120(b), 420, 423,

465, 468 & 471 of IPC in Cr.No.60 of 2013.

2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all

factual in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court

cannot decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482

of Criminal Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all

the grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on

its own merits and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to

interfere with the proceedings pending before the Court below.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to

dispense with the presence of the petitioner. Taking into consideration,

the facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioner is

dispensed with and he shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross

examine the witnesses on the same day, they are examined in Chief. The

petitioner shall be present before the Court below at the time of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C and at the time of passing of the

final judgement.

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with

a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in CC No.58

of 2016 as expeditiously as possible. The trial shall be conducted on a

day to day basis in accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1)

MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open

to the trial Court to insist upon the presence of the petitioner and

remand him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH

SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191). Consequently, connected miscellaneous

petitions are also closed.

26.07.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rli

M.DHANDAPANI.J,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

rli

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Kanchipuram.

2. The Inspector of Police, DCB Kancheepuram.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

CRL.O.P No.5292 of 2018 and Crl.M.P Nos.2616 & 2617 of 2018

26.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter