Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Jayachandran vs Mohamed Sirajudeen
2021 Latest Caselaw 14625 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14625 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Jayachandran vs Mohamed Sirajudeen on 22 July, 2021
                                                                     Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and
                                                                                CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021
                                                                                  in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
                                                 DATED: 22.07.2021
                                                      CORAM:
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                         Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021
                                                        and
                                             CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021
                                                         in
                                              S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

                     R.Jayachandran                                                        ...Applicant

                                                          Vs.

                     1.Mohamed Sirajudeen
                     2.Mohammed Bakrudeen
                       Murugan(died)
                     3.Malathi
                     4.Pandeeswari
                     5.Thennarasu
                     6.Pandiarasu                                                       ..Respondents

                     Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w. Section 114 of
                     C.P.C., praying to review the judgment and decree dated 10.02.2021 passed
                     in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021.


                                          For Applicant         : Mr.D.Malaichamy




                     1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                          Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and
                                                                                     CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021
                                                                                       in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021



                                                          ORDER

This review petition is at the instance of the appellant in

S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021.

2.The suit was laid by the appellant seeking permanent injunction

restraining the defendants 1 and 2, who are admittedly the legal heirs of the

owner of the property from interfering with his possession on the ground

that he is in possession of the property as a cultivating tenant. According to

the plaintiff, his father's maternal grand mother, Nallammal became a

cultivating tenant from 1969 and cultivated the property by contributing her

own physical labour and that of her family members. The said tenancy was

also registered with the Officer authorized to register tenancies under

Tamilnadu Agricultural Land Record of Tenancy Rights Act (Act 10 of

1969).

3.According to the plaintiff, on the death of the plaintiff's father's

maternal grand mother, Nallammal in the year 1979, her only daughter,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021 in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

Ayyakkal, who is the paternal grand mother of the plaintiff was cultivating

the property by contributing her own physical labour as a cultivating tenant.

After the death of said Ayyakkal, the father of the plaintiff, Raju Thevar was

the cultivating tenant. On the death of Raju Thevar on 10.06.2005, the

plaintiff continued to cultivate the property. Claiming that the defendants 1

and 2 attempted to interfere with his possession, the plaintiff sought for a

decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering

with his possession of the property.

4.The suit was resisted by the 4th defendant contending that the

plaintiff was never in possession of the property and he was not a

cultivating tenant. The 4th defendant also claim that the maternal grand

mother of the plaintiff's father, Nallammal also did not cultivate the

property. The Trial Court dismissed the suit on the conclusion that the

plaintiff has not established that he has been contributing his own physical

labour in cultivation of the property as required under the Tamilnadu

Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955. The Court also faulted the

plaintiff for not having disclosed the existence of the other legal heirs of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021 in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

Raju Thevar. On the said conclusion, the learned Trial Judge dismissed the

suit. Aggrieved, the plaintiff preferred an appeal in A.S.No.79 of 2015. The

Appellate Court concurred with the findings of the Trial Court and

dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved, the plaintiff preferred second appeal in

S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021. I had dismissed the second appeal on 10.02.2021,

aggreing with the conclusions of the Trial Court and the Appellate Court to

the effect that the plaintiff has not established that he is contributing his

own physical labour or that of any members of his family in cultivation of

the lands. It is the judgment, which is sought to be reviewed.

5.Heard, Mr.D.Malaichamy, learned counsel appearing for the

review applicant.

6.Mr.D.Malaichamy would vehemently contend that both the Trial

Court as well as th Appellate Court had based their conclusions only on the

premise that the plaintiff has not disclosed the existence of the legal heirs

and the said premise, according to the learned counsel is incorrect, since as

per the definition of the term cultivating tenant found in the Section 2(aa) of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021 in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

the Tamilnadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, a person, who contributes

his own physical labour or any members of his family could be a tenant de

hors, the availability of other heirs of the deceased cultivating tenant.

Therefore, according to Mr.D.Malaichamy, the fact that the Trial Court as

well as the Appellate Court had over looked a very essential ingredient,

while recording a finding against the petitioner herein vitiates the same.

7.I have bestowed my anxious consideration of the contentions of

the learned counsel. I am unable to countenance the submissions of the

learned counsel appearing for the review applicant. Both the Courts below,

apart from finding that the plaintiff is not the only legal heir of Raju Thevar,

have also recorded specific findings to the effect that the plaintiff has not

established that he has been cultivating the property by contributing his own

physical labour or that any members of his family. Of course, the Courts

have referred to the fact that the plaintiff has suppressed the existence of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021 in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

other heirs of Raju Thevar but that by itself has not been made a reason for

rejecting the claim of the plaintiff. I therefore, do not see any substance of

the review. The review application is therefore, dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.07.2021

kkn

Internet:Yes Index:No Speaking

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021 in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

KKN

Rev.Application(MD).No.38 of 2021 and CMP(MD).No.5078 of 2021 in S.A(MD).No.58 of 2021

22.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter