Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Balathandayutham @ ... vs R.Kabilan
2021 Latest Caselaw 14450 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14450 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Balathandayutham @ ... vs R.Kabilan on 19 July, 2021
                                                                        C.R.P(MD) Nos.955 to 957 of 2014


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED :19.07.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
                                        C.R.P.(MD)(NPD) Nos.955 to 957 of 2014
                                                        and
                                                M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014

                 1.Balathandayutham @ Balathandayuthabani

                 2.M.Rajendran                                                      ... Petitioners
                                                                                  ( in all petitions)
                                                         -vs-

                 1.R.Kabilan

                 2.K.Rajamanickam

                 3.K.Nagarajan                                                   ... Respondents
                                                                                  ( in all petitions)
                 COMMON PRAYER: These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article
                 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records from the file of the Court
                 of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu, Thanjavur District
                 pertaining to the judgment and decree dated 03.03.2014 made in I.A.Nos.50, 51
                 and 52 of 2014 in O.S.No.24 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the District
                 Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu, Thanjavur District and set aside the
                 same, by allowing this Civil Revision Petitions.


                 1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                         C.R.P(MD) Nos.955 to 957 of 2014




                                         For Petitioner     : Mr.S.Kanagarajan

                                         For Respondents    : Mr.G.Karnan
                                                                    ( in all petitions)



                                                    COMMON ORDER


                           These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed to set aside the judgment

                 and decree dated 03.03.2014 made in I.A.Nos.50, 51 and 52 of 2014 in O.S.No.24

                 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,

                 Orathanadu, Thanjavur District.



                           2.The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the petitioners are the

                 plaintiffs and the Respondents are the defendants. The above suit was filed for

                 declaration and injunction. The plaintiffs had filed the above applications in the

                 present suit, seeking to reopen the case, to recall the evidence of P.W.2 and to

                 accept the documents. Since the said applications were dismissed, by the

                 impugned orders, these Civil Revision Petitions have been filed.




                 2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                          C.R.P(MD) Nos.955 to 957 of 2014


                           3.The learned counsel for the Petitioners has submitted that the petitioners

                 were able to trace the documents at their house only belatedly and therefore, they

                 were unable to present the application to recall the evidence of P.W.2

                 immediately, after the closure of cross examination of P.W.1 and that it becomes

                 necessary for the plaintiffs to establish their cases and if the petitions are allowed

                 with cost, the petitioners are ready to pay the same. Hence, he seeks to allow

                 these revisions.



                           4.The learned counsel for the Respondents has submitted that the

                 applications have been filed after completion of trial proceedings and they have

                 not given proper explanation as to why the documents have not been marked at

                 the time of hearings and the petitions have been filed belatedly and only with an

                 intention to drag on the proceedings, the present applications have been filed and

                 when the evidence on their side was closed, they have no right to reopen the same

                 and that the court below is justified in dismissing the applications, by the

                 impugned order.




                 3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                          C.R.P(MD) Nos.955 to 957 of 2014


                           5.This court heard the learned counsel on either side and considered their

                 submissions and also carefully perused the materials placed on record.



                           6.The present suit was filed for declaration and injunction. The suit is of

                 the year 2012. The Plaintiffs should have taken necessary steps to mark the

                 documents and to examine the witness at the threshold itself or at the time when

                 the evidence was going on and only to drag on the proceedings, the said

                 applications had been filed. Considering the said reasons, the court below had

                 rightly refused to reopen the case, to recall the witness and to accept the

                 document, by the impugned orders, which warrants no interference by this Court.



                           7.In fine, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs.

                 Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                               19.07.2021

                 Internet : Yes / No
                 Index    : Yes / No
                 cp/msa



                 4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                               C.R.P(MD) Nos.955 to 957 of 2014




                                                      A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

cp/msa

Order made in C.R.P.(MD)(NPD) Nos.955 to 957 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014

Dated:

19.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter