Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Keswariall Bolah vs M/S.Grayshott Owners ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 14331 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14331 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Keswariall Bolah vs M/S.Grayshott Owners ... on 16 July, 2021
                                                                           C.S.No.788 of 2018

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 16.07.2021

                                         CORAM : JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

                                                 C.S.No.788 of 2018
                                         & O.A.Nos.1096, 1098 & 1099 of 2018
                                                & A.No.2133 of 2020


                     1.Keswariall Bolah
                     2.Mrs.Sewrani Bolah                         ...           Plaintiffs

                                                        Vs.


                     1.M/s.Grayshott Owners Association,
                       Represented by its President,
                       Major K.S.Mani,
                       No.4, Bishop Garden Extension,
                       Raja Annamalaipuram,
                       Chennai 600 028.

                     2.M/s.Grayshott Owners Association,
                       Represented by its Secretary,
                       D.Ramesh,
                       No.4, Bishop Garden Extension,
                       Raja Annamalaipuram,
                       Chennai 600 028.

                     3.K.Shanmugam
                     4.T.Soundararajan
                     5.Nirupa Vishwanath
                     6.Ashwin Ravindranath
                     7.Haja Mohideen
                     8.B.M.Chandrasekhar                         ...           Defendants


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/5
                                                                                   C.S.No.788 of 2018




                     PRAYER : Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the O.S.Rules read
                     with Order VII Rule 1 C.P.C, 1908:


                                   A) Directing the Defendants jointly and severally to pay to
                                      the plaintiffs a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One
                                      Crore only) towards damages for loss of reputation,
                                      mental agony, physical strain and stress suffered by
                                      them at the hands of the Defendants on account of their
                                      actions, deeds and things in relation to the Flat bearing
                                      No.K-301 in the Third Floor “K” Block, “ Greyshott
                                      Apartments”, more fully described in the Schedule “A”
                                      to the Plaint,
                                   B) For a Permanent injunction restraining the Defendants,
                                      their agents, servants, men or anyone claiming under or
                                      through them and/or authorised by them from in any
                                      manner interfering with the Plaintiffs' peaceful
                                      possession and enjoyment of their Flat including the
                                      free ingres and egress through the main door as well as
                                      the newly fixed door at Flat bearing No.K-301 in the
                                      Third Floor “K” Block, “Greyshott Apartments”, more
                                      fully described in Schedule “A” to the plaint;
                                   C) For a Permanent Injunction restraining the Defendants,
                                      their agents, servants, men or anyone claiming under or
                                      through them and/or authorised by them from in any
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     2/5
                                                                                    C.S.No.788 of 2018

                                      manner interfering with the right of the Plaintiffs to
                                      attend to repairs, Plastering, Patti work, painting,
                                      Polishing, fixing of wash basin in the Wash Room and
                                      other incidental work to be accomplished through the
                                      Plaintiffs' Civil Engineer and his workmen, as per
                                      Schedule “B” to the plaint, except in accordance with
                                      law;
                                   D) For a Permanent Injunction restraining the Defendants,
                                      their agents, servants, men or anyone claiming under or
                                      through them and/or authorised by them from in any
                                      manner interfering with the plaintiffs' relatives, guests,
                                      servants, men, service personnel etc. from visiting their
                                      Flat bearing No.K-301 in the Third Floor “K” Block,
                                      “Greyshott Apartments”, more fully described in
                                      Schedule “A” to the plaint, except in accordance with
                                      law;
                                   E) For such further or other reliefs;
                                   F) Costs of the suit.

                                       For Plaintiffs       : Mr.R.Thiagarajan
                                       For Defendants
                                       1 to 3, 7 and 8      : Ms.R.Ramya


                                                           JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for both sides have logged in.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.S.No.788 of 2018

2.A Joint memo of compromise was filed and the learned counsel

appearing for the plaintiffs and the defendants 1 to 3, 7 and 8 agreed with

the terms of the Joint memo of compromise.

3.The Joint memo of compromise is recorded and the Registry is directed

to prepare a decree in terms of the Joint memo of compromise. The suit is

accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected

applications are closed.

16.07.2021

Tsg

Index : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.S.No.788 of 2018

N.SESHASAYEE.J.,

Tsg

C.S.No.788 of 2018

16.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter