Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs C.Dharmalingam
2021 Latest Caselaw 14317 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14317 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs C.Dharmalingam on 16 July, 2021
                                                                        W.A. No.552 of 2021 and
                                                                         C.M.P. No.2190 of 2021

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 16.07.2021

                                                      CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                       and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                              W.A. No.552 of 2021 and
                                              C.M.P. No.2190 of 2021

                   1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by its Secretary
                     Environment and Forest Department
                     Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009

                   2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest
                     having office at Panagal Maaligai
                     Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015

                   3.The District Forest Officer
                     Kodaikkanal, Dindigul District

                   4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                     Office at DMS Compound
                     Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018                          ... Appellants

                                                        vs

                   C.Dharmalingam                                          ... Respondent


                                                       ****
                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                   against the order dated 28.09.2016 made in W.P. No.34039 of 2016.
                                                       ****




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                       W.A. No.552 of 2021 and
                                                                        C.M.P. No.2190 of 2021

                                    For Appellants       :   Mr.R.Neelakandan
                                                             Government Pleader


                                                    JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court

dated 28.09.2016 made in W.P. No.34039 of 2016. The appellants

herein are the respondents before the writ court and the respondent

herein is the writ petitioner.

2. The respondent herein/writ petitioner was appointed as a

temporary plot watcher in Forest department on 16.11.1984 and his

services were regularised on 7.8.2009 and he retired on 30.04.2016.

As his services were regularised after 25 years, he prayed for counting

of 50% of the temporary services rendered by him along with his

remaining service for the purpose of calculating pension and retiral

benefits by filing a writ of mandamus in W.P. No.33251 of 2015. The

said writ petition was allowed, based on the judgment passed in W.A.

Nos.27 and 28 of 2012 dated 11.11.2013. The appellants were

directed to consider and dispose of petitioner's representation based

on the orders passed in the above referred writ appeal in a time bound

manner. It is also to be noted that the said issue of counting 50% of

the temporary services rendered by a person for computing the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.552 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.2190 of 2021

pensionary benefits is no longer res integra in view of the recent

judgment of the Full Bench of this court in Government of Tamil

Nadu and Ors. vs. R. Kaliyamoorthy reported in (2019) 6 CTC

3. However the learned Government Pleader representing the

appellants would state that the order passed by the learned single

Judge was implemented and given effect in its letter and spirit.

4. In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                      16.07.2021
                   Asr
                   Index            : Yes/No




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.552 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.2190 of 2021

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A. No.552 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.2190 of 2021

16.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter