Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P. Chandrasekaran vs The Chief Engineer (Agricultural ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 14117 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14117 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2021

Madras High Court
P. Chandrasekaran vs The Chief Engineer (Agricultural ... on 15 July, 2021
                                                                                 W.P.No.8002 of 2014



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED:     15.07.2021

                                                        CORAM :

                                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ


                                                W.P.No..8002 of 2014

                      P. Chandrasekaran                                          ... Petitioner

                              Vs

                      The Chief Engineer (Agricultural Engineering)
                      Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035
                                                                                   ... Respondent

                      Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                      issue an appropriate order, directions or writ including            a writ of
                      Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the record relating to the
                      impugned order of the respondent in Me.Pa.2/53050/2012 dated
                      14.02.2014 and quash the same.

                            For Petitioner      :      Mr. P. Manoj Kumar
                            For Respondent      :      Mr. C. Selvaraj
                                                        Government Advocate


                                                         ORDER

Challenge has been made to the order of revision in

proceedings Se.Mu.No.Me.Pa.2/53050/2012 dated 14.02.2014 by the

respondent.

__________

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.8002 of 2014

2. According to the petitioner, he was initially appointed as

Assistant Soil Conservation Officer on 19.01.1983 and he was

thereafter promoted as Junior Engineer (Agricultural Engineering) on

16.11.2007. As per the Rule 9 (a) (ii) of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural

Subordinate Service Rules, for promotion to the post of Junior

Engineer, the incumbent should have passed the departmental

examination within a period of five (5) years. Since the petitioner

had not passed the examination within the period of five years, he

was reverted to the post of Assistant Soil Conservation Officer.

3. According to the petitioner, he joined as Junior Engineer with

effect from 17.11.2007 in proceedings Me.Pa.2/13328/2008 dated

31.05.2008. Therefore he had five years time up to May, 2013. He

ought to have passed the examination before May, 2013, however, he

passed the examination belatedly. Therefore, he was reverted from

that post.

4. The record of proceedings would show that by virtue of

interim order granted by this Court, the petitioner continued in the

__________

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.8002 of 2014

post of Junior Engineer and retired from service on attaining the age

of superannuation.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit

that in an identical case, a similarly placed person, who was reverted

on account of not passing the test in time, was directed to make a

representation to the respondent and a further direction to forward

the same to the Secretary, Agricultural Department for consideration.

6. In that case, the Government in G.O.M.S No.70 Agricultural

Department dated 08.04.2021 considered the case of the writ

petitioner therein and regularized his service in relaxation of Rule 9

(a)(ii). Same is the case in respect of two other persons in G.O.(D)

No.78, Agricultural Department dated 20.03.2017 and

G.O.(D).No.293, Agricultural Department dated 24.11.2017.

Therefore, he prays for similar and equal treatment be accorded to

him also.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find

that the request made by the petitioner for equal treatment on par

__________

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.8002 of 2014

with the similarly placed persons is reasonable. Therefore, I direct

the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent within a

period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

order enclosing the judgment of this Court as well as Government

Orders in the case of similarly placed persons. On receipt of such

representation, the respondent is directed to forward the same to the

Secretary, Agricultural Department for consideration. The Secretary,

Agricultural Department is further directed to consider the

representation of the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in

accordance with law, taking into consideration the precedents within

a period of eight (8) weeks thereafter.

8. The Writ Petition is disposed of on the above lines. No costs.

15.07.2021

Index : Yes/No mrn

To The Chief Engineer (Agricultural Engineering) Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

__________

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.8002 of 2014

__________

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.8002 of 2014

M.GOVINDARAJ, J.

(mrn)

W.P.No.8002 of 2014

15.07.2021

__________

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter