Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs M.Radhammal
2021 Latest Caselaw 14103 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14103 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs M.Radhammal on 14 July, 2021
                                                                          W.A. No.1725 of 2018 and
                                                                           C.M.P. No.13792 of 2018

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 14.07.2021

                                                       CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                         and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                               W.A. No.1725 of 2018 and
                                               C.M.P. No.13792 of 2018

                   1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by its Secretary
                     Environment and Forest Department
                     Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009

                   2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
                     having office at Panagal Maaligai
                     Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015

                   3.The District Forest Officer
                     Vellore District

                   4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                     Office at DMS Compound
                     Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018                              ... Appellants

                                                          vs

                   M.Radhammal                                                 ... Respondent


                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                   against the order dated 21.07.2015 made in W.P. No.21738 of 2015.


                                     For Petitioner        :   Mr.R.Neelakandan
                                                               State Government Counsel
                                     For Respondent        :   Mr.S.Mani

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                      W.A. No.1725 of 2018 and
                                                                       C.M.P. No.13792 of 2018

                                                    JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court

order dated 21.07.2015 made in W.P. No.21738 of 2015. The

appellants herein are the respondents before the writ court and the

respondent herein is the writ petitioner.

2. The respondent/writ petitioner's husband, was appointed as a

temporary plot watcher in the services of the third appellant

department on 01.05.1982 and his services were regularised on

28.12.2004 and he died on 16.12.2014, while he was in service. As

the services of her husband were regularized after 22 years, she

prayed for counting of 50% of the temporary services rendered by her

husband along with his remaining service for the purpose of

calculating the pension and terminal benefits by filing a writ of

mandamus in W.P. No.21738 of 2015. The said writ petition was

allowed, based on the judgment passed in W.A. Nos.27 and 28 of

2012 dated 13.02.2012 and directed the respondents 1 to 3 therein to

count half of the service rendered by the husband of the writ

petitioner as Social Forest Watcher on daily wages basis along with

regular service rendered by her husband till the date of his death as

qualifying service, in a time bound manner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1725 of 2018 and C.M.P. No.13792 of 2018

3. It is also to be noted that the said issue of counting 50% of

the temporary services rendered by a person for computing the

pensionary benefits is no longer res integra in view of the recent

judgment of the Full Bench of this court in the Government of Tamil

Nadu and Ors. vs. R. Kaliyamoorthy reported in (2019) 6 CTC

4. However the learned Government Pleader representing the

appellants would state that the order passed by the learned single

Judge was implemented and given effect vide G.O.(3D) No.20

Environment and Forests (FR2-2) Department dated 28.04.2016. The

learned counsel appearing for the respondent/writ petitioner also

confirms that the order was implemented.

5. In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                      14.07.2021
                   Asr
                   Index            : Yes/No



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1725 of 2018 and C.M.P. No.13792 of 2018

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A. No.1725 of 2018 and C.M.P. No.13792 of 2018

14.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter