Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kumar vs The Managing Director
2021 Latest Caselaw 14020 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14020 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Kumar vs The Managing Director on 14 July, 2021
                                                                           C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 14.07.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL

                                               C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020

                   Kumar                                                     .. Appellant


                                                           Vs.




                   The Managing Director,
                   Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Div I) Ltd.,
                   3/137, Salamedu Vazhuthareddy Villupuram                  .. Respondent



                   Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
                   Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated
                   02.07.2020 made in M.C.O.P.No.2101 of 2016 on the file of the Motor
                   Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional Sub Judge, Cuddalore.



                                         For Appellant     :      Mrs.Ramya V.Rao

                                         For Respondent    :      Mr.T.S.K.Sathish Kumar




                   1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020

                                                        JUDGMENT

(The Case has been heard through Video Conference)

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed for enhancement of

compensation granted by the award dated 02.07.2020 made in

M.C.O.P.No.2101 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

I Additional Sub Judge, Cuddalore.

2.The appellant is the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.2101 of 2016 on the file

of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional Sub Judge, Cuddalore.

He filed the above said claim petition, claiming a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as

compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the accident that took place

on 08.03.2016.

3.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving by

the driver of the bus belonging to the respondent-Transport Corporation and

directed the respondent-Transport Corporation to pay a sum of

Rs.14,60,500/- as compensation to the appellant/claimant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020

4.Not being satisfied with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal, the

appellant has come out with the present appeal seeking enhancement of

compensation.

5.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that the

Tribunal ought to have granted compensation for 100% permanent disability

to the appellant instead granting compensation for 90% permanent disability.

The appellant was working as a Mason and earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per

month and the monthly income fixed by the Tribunal at Rs.6,500/- is meagre.

The amounts awarded by the Tribunal under different heads are meagre and

prayed for enhancement of compensation.

6.Per contra, Mr.T.S.K.Sathish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for

the respondent-Transport Corporation contended that in the absence of any

material evidence to prove the avocation and income, the monthly income

fixed by the Tribunal at Rs.6,500/- is not meagre. The Tribunal accepted the

disability of the appellant at 90% as assessed by the Medical Board and

adopted multiplier method for awarding compensation towards future loss of

income. Therefore, the appellant is not entitled to any enhancement. The

amounts awarded by the Tribunal under different heads are not meagre and

prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020

7.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the

learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Transport Corporation and

perused the entire materials on record.

8.From the award passed by the Tribunal, it is seen that the appellant's

right leg above knee was amputated and the JIPMER Medical Board,

Puducherry has assessed that the appellant suffered 90% partial permanent

disability and issued Ex.C1/disability certificate to that effect. The Tribunal

after considering Ex.C1/disability certificate, adopted multiplier method for

awarding compensation towards future loss of income, which is proper. It is

the contention of the appellant that he was working as a Mason and was

earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month. He failed to prove the said

contention. In the absence of any material evidence with regard to avocation

and income, the Tribunal fixed a sum of Rs.6,500/- per month as notional

income of the appellant. The accident occurred in the year 2016 and the

appellant was aged 41 years at the time of accident. Considering the year of

accident, age and nature of work done by the appellant, the notional income

fixed by the Tribunal at Rs.6,500/- per month is meagre and the same is

enhanced to Rs.12,000/- per month. In view of the above, the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal towards future loss of income is modified to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020

Rs.22,68,000/- {[Rs.12,000/- + Rs.3,000/- (25% of Rs.12,000/-)] x 12 x 14 x

90/100]}. In view of the excess amounts awarded by the Tribunal towards

pain and sufferings, extra nourishment and attendant charges, the appellant is

not entitled for further enhancement. The Tribunal awarded a sum of

Rs.75,000/-, Rs.5,000/- and Rs.15,000/- towards loss of amenities,

transportation and future medical expenses are hereby enhanced to

Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.25,000/- and Rs.20,000/- respectively. Therefore, the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal under other heads are just and

reasonable and hence, the same are confirmed. Thus, the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal is modified as follows:



                    S.             Description   Amount awarded Amount awarded Award confirmed
                    No                            by Tribunal    by this Court  or enhanced or
                                                      (Rs)            (Rs)          granted
                    1. Permanent disability           12,28,500/-      22,68,000/-     Enhanced
                       and loss of income
                    2. Pain and sufferings             1,00,000/-       1,00,000/-    Confirmed
                    3. Loss of amenities                75,000/-        1,00,000/-     Enhanced
                    4. Extra nourishment                25,000/-          25,000/-    Confirmed
                    5. Attendant charges                12,000/-          12,000/-    Confirmed
                    6. Transportation                     5,000/-         25,000/-     Enhanced
                    7. Future medical                   15,000/-          20,000/-     Enhanced
                       expenses
                          Total                   Rs.14,60,500/-    Rs.25,50,000/-   enhanced by
                                                                                     Rs.10,89,500/-




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020




9.In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed and

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.14,60,500/- is hereby

enhanced to Rs.25,50,000/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per

annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. The appellant-

claimant is directed to pay necessary Court fee, if any, on the enhanced

compensation. The respondent-Transport Corporation is directed to deposit

the enhanced award amount now determined by this Court along with interest

and costs, less the amount already deposited if any, within a period of twelve

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such deposit,

the appellant is permitted to withdraw the enhanced award amount, along

with interest and costs, less the amount if any, already withdrawn. No costs.



                                                                                         14.07.2021

                   gbi

                   Index            : Yes / No
                   Internet         : Yes / No





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                       C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020




                   To

                   1.The I Additional Sub Judge,
                     Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                    Cuddalore.

                   2.The Section Officer,
                     VR Section,
                     High Court,
                     Madras.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                    C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020



                                    S.KANNAMMAL, J.

                                                     gbi




                                   C.M.A.No.1336 of 2020




                                              14.07.2021





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter