Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13209 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2021
T.C.A.No.989 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 05.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
Tax Case Appeal No.989 of 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Smart Professional Services (P) Ltd.,
T-11, K.G.Plaza, 3rd Floor,
No.41-44, General Patters Road,
Chennai 600 002. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Chennai "C" Bench, dated 11.03.2015 passed in
I.T.A.No.2484/Mds/2014 for the assessment year 2011-2012.
For Appellant : Mr. J.Narayanasamy
Senior Standing Counsel
JUDGMENT
Page 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.989 of 2015
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.) We have heard Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue.
2. The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order
dated 11.03.2015 made in I.T.A.No.2484/Mds/2014 on the file of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "C" Bench (for brevity, the
Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2011-2012.
3. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question
of law:-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the profits earned by the assessee from the sale of the shares of 2 companies, viz., M/s.Sriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., and M/s.Oriental Green Power Ltd., is to be treated as income from business and not as income from short term capital gains."
4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.989 of 2015
appellant submits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on
account of the Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated
08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said
Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the
High Court has been increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that
the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.
5. In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal
is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The
substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect
in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, liberty
is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the
appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [R.H., J.]
Index : Yes/No 05.07.2021
Internet : Yes
gv
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.989 of 2015
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and R.HEMALATHA,J
gv
To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai,"C" Bench
Tax Case Appeal No.989 of 2015
05.07.2021
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!