Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Headmistress & Correspondent vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 12968 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12968 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Headmistress & Correspondent vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 2 July, 2021
                                                                  W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 02.07.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                          W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021
                                                    and
                                      W.M.P(MD)Nos.8579 & 8580 of 2021

                 The Headmistress & Correspondent,
                 Regina Caeli Girls Higher Secondary School,
                 Ammapettai,
                 Thanjavur District – 614 401.                    ... Petitioner


                                                         vs.
                 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                   Rep. by its Secretary,
                   Department of Higher Education,
                   Fort St. George,
                   Chennai – 600 009.

                 2.The Director of School Education,
                   College Road,
                   Chennai – 600 006.

                 3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                   Panagal Building,
                   Thanjavur District – 613 001.

                 4.The District Educational Officer,
                   Orathanaadu,
                   Tanjore District – 625 531.                          ... Respondents




                 1/10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

                 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                 issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating
                 to the impugned order passed by the third respondent-Chief Educational
                 Officer in O.Mu.No.3124/A2/2019, dated 15.03.2021 (as signed) and the
                 consequential         proceedings     issued   by   the   fourth   respondent-District
                 Educational        Officer   in    O.Mu.No.1363/A3/2019,     dated   28.04.2021    (as
                 signed), quash the same and further direct the third and fourth respondents
                 to approve forthwith the appointment of S.Vanacka Selvi as P.G Assistant
                 (History) in the petitioner-School with effect from the date of her
                 appointment viz., 04.09.2018 and release salary and all attendant benefits
                 with effect from the said date.


                                   For Petitioner           : Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar


                                   For Respondents          : Mr.P.Subbaraj
                                                              Government Advocate



                                                           ORDER

The petitioner-School has filed the present Writ Petition, to quash the

impugned order passed by the third respondent, dated 15.03.2021 and the

consequential proceedings issued by the fourth respondent, dated

28.04.2021 and to direct the third and fourth respondents to approve

forthwith the appointment of S.Vanacka Selvi as P.G Assistant (History) in

the petitioner-School with effect from the date of her appointment viz.,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

04.09.2018 and release salary and all attendant benefits with effect from

the said date.

2.According to the petitioner, the petitioner School is a recognised

aided Minority Educational Institution. In the said School, there are 35

Teachers viz., 1 Headmistress, 10 PG Assistants, 2 Vocational Instructors,

13 BT Assistants, 3 Tamil Pandits, 3 Secondary Grade Teachers, 1 Physical

Education Teacher, 1 Sewing Teacher and 1 Music Teacher, working and they

are received aid from the State Government. Apart from the above teaching

staffs, there are 5 aided non-teaching staffs viz., 1 Junior Assistant, 1 Lab

Assistant, 1 Record Clerk, 1 Office Assistant and 1 Watchman, working in

the School. There are 1012 students studying in the School. One post of

Post Graduate (PG) Assistant fell vacant in the petitioner School on

04.09.2018 due to the transfer of the then incumbent N.Grace Mary on

03.09.2018. The petitioner's school appointed one S.Vanacka Selvi as PG

Assistant (History) on 04.09.2018 and she continues to work in the school

till date. The petitioner School submitted a proposal to the fourth

respondent on 05.12.2018, requesting to approve the appointment of

S.Vanacka Selvi and disburse grant-in-aid towards her salary. In the

meantime, the third and fourth respondents by the impugned orders, dated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

15.03.2021 and 28.04.2021 respectively, rejected the proposal for approval

of the appointment of S.Vanacka Selvi. Challenging the said orders, the

petitioner has come out with the present writ petition.

3.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents

submitted that at the time of passing the impugned order, the respondents

referred the interim order, dated 09.04.2019 passed by the Division Bench

of this Court in W.A(MD)No.76 of 2019 etc., batch and G.O.(Ms)No.165,

School Education (Tho.Ka.2(1) Department, dated 17.09.2019.

Subsequently, in the writ appeal batch, this Court finally issued certain

guidelines with regard to approval of appointment. In this regard, he relied

on the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, dated 31.03.2021, in

W.A(MD)Nos.76 of 2019 etc., batch and the relevant portion of the

judgment is extracted hereunder:-

“95 (u) Till such excess teaching staff are identified under all category of schools as indicated above, no recruitment shall be made by the State Government / Education Department for the purpose of appointment of teachers under various categories like Secondary grade teacher, Graduate teacher, Post-Graduate teacher, Language teacher, Physical education teacher etc.,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

(v) Like that insofar as aided minority institutions are concerned if it is a stand along institution, their right of appointing a teacher in a vacancy within the sanctioned strength for the academic year 2021-22 shall not be affected because of the identified excess teachers in other schools. At the same time, even if the school is a minority institution, however being administered by a joint management or corporate management, in respect of those schools, even though vacancy arose within the sanctioned strength of such school or schools under corporate management or joint management, those vacancies shall not be filled up unless the excess staff identified in all other schools under the same corporate or joint management are exhausted fully and only after exhausting the redeployment process on all excess teachers identified in the group of schools under the same corporate management, they shall be free to make appointment afresh from open market in the vacancy if any still, within the sanctioned strength”

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents

by relying on the above judgment submitted that if the petitioner's school

resubmitted the proposal, the respondents 3 & 4 will pass orders following

the guidelines issued by the Division Bench of this Court, dated 31.03.2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and perused

the materials available on record.

6. The petitioner's School, which is a minority educational institution,

appointed one S.Vanacka Selvi as PG Assistant (History) in the vacancy

arose due to the transfer of one N.Grace Mary PG Assistant (History).

Subsequently, the third and fourth respondents by the impugned orders,

dated 15.03.2021 and 28.04.2021 respectively, rejected the proposal for

approval of the appointment of S.Vanacka Selvi and the reasons given by

the respondents 3 and 4 are erroneous.

7. The petitioner's School, which is a minority institution, can fill up

the sanctioned vacancy without obtaining prior permission. Subsequent to

the interim order, dated 09.04.2019 in W.A(MD)No.76 of 2019 etc., batch

referred in the impugned order by the third respondent and G.O.Ms.No.165,

School Education Department, dated 17.09.2019, another Division Bench of

this Court considering the said issue in the very same Writ Appeal, has

suspended the operation of G.O.(Ms)No.165, School Education Department,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

dated 17.09.2019, passed in pursuant to the interim order dated

09.04.2019 in W.A(MD)No.76 of 2019 etc., batch, by order, dated

20.09.2019, until further orders. Subsequently, another Division Bench of

this Court taken up W.A(MD)No.76 of 2019 etc., batch for final hearing and

considered the issue in detail, vide judgment dated 31.03.2021, in Para

95(o) declared the said Government Order as inoperative. The relevant

portion of the said judgment reads as follow:-

“95. (o) In view of the aforesaid, the G.O.Ms.No.165, School Education [Tho.Ka.2(1)] Department, dated 17.09.2019 is hereby declared to be inoperative.”

8.In view of the subsequent interim order, dated 20.09.2019 and

judgment dated 31.03.2021 made in W.A(MD)No.76 of 2019 etc., batch, the

reliance placed by the third respondent in the impugned order on the

interim order of the Division Bench of this Court, dated 09.04.2019 and

G.O.(Ms)No.165, School Education Department, dated 17.09.2019, is

erroneous. Hence, the impugned orders passed by the respondents 3 and

4, dated 15.03.2021 and 28.04.2021 are liable to be set aside and are

hereby set aside. The respondents 3 and 4 are directed to approve the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

appointment of S.Vanacka Selvi as PG Assistant (History). The respondents

3 and 4 are directed to approve the appointment of S.Vanacka Selvi, and

pass orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order and sanction and disburse all the monetary benefits to

S.Vanacka Selvi.

9.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is allowed. No costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

02.07.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

To

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Panagal Building, Thanjavur District – 613 001.

4.The District Educational Officer, Orathanaadu, Tanjore District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

ps

W.P(MD)No.10934 of 2021

02.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter