Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12924 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021
W.A.No.2639 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.A.No.2639 of 2018
and CMP No.21444 of 2018
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rep by Secretary to Government,
Forest and Environment Department,
Fort.St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
Panagal Building, Saidapet,
Chennai – 600 015.
3. The District Forest Officer,
Villupuram Forestry Division,
Villupuram.
4. The Principal Accountant General of Tamil Nadu,
Teynampet, Chennai - 18 ... Appellants
Vs.
S. Krishnan ... Respondent
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of Letter Patents Act, filed praying
to set aside the final order dated 05.08.2016 in W.P.No.30286 of 2016 passed
by the learned Single Judge.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.2639 of 2018
For Appellants : Mr.R.Neelakandan
Government Counsel
For Respondent : Ms.K.Jenitha
JUDGMENT
(delivered by MRS.PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J.,)
The writ petitioner has sought for a mandamus directing the respondents
to count half of the service rendered by him as Social Forestry Worker from
01.08.1985 to 12.07.2012 along with the regular service from 13.07.2012 till
the date of retirement on 31.07.2016 for the purpose of grant of pensionary
benefits, which was disposed of by this Court on 05.08.2016 in
W.P.Nos.30286 to 30288 of 2016, directing the authorities to implement the
same within a period of twelve weeks.
2. Aggrieved by the same, writ appeal has been preferred by the State.
3. The question in dispute is no longer res integra as already the Full
Bench of this Court in the case of Government of Tamil Nadu vs
R.Kaliyamoorthy reported in 2019 (6) CTC 705 has held that any person who
has been regularised before the cut-off date i.e., 01.04.2003, is entitled for
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.2639 of 2018
pension in view of Proviso to Rule 1(2) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules,
1978.
4. Admittedly, the respondent was regularised as early as 24.01.1995
i.e., prior to the cut-off date. In view of the Full Bench Decision of this Court
reported in 2019 (6) CTC 705 (Government of Tamil Nadu vs
R.Kaliyamoorthy, the order passed by the learned Single Judge is confirmed.
5. It is pertinent to note that pursuant to the order of the learned Single
Judge, the Government had implemented the order passed by the learned Single
Judge.
6. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ appeal. The writ appeal is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
(P.S.N.J.,) (K.R.J.,) 01.07.2021 sr
Index:yes/no
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.2639 of 2018
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J., AND KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,
sr
W.A.No.2639 of 2018
01.07.2021.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!