Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Principal Commissioner Of vs M/S.Hidesign India Pvt. Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 553 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 553 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Madras High Court
The Principal Commissioner Of vs M/S.Hidesign India Pvt. Ltd on 7 January, 2021
                                                                                     TCA.No.28 of 2021


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                         DATED : 07.1.2021

                                                             CORAM

                                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

                                                               and

                                         THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

                                                Tax Case Appeal No.28 of 2021


                     The Principal Commissioner of
                     Income Tax, Corporate Circle 2(2),
                     Chennai-34                                                      ...Appellant
                                                       Vs
                     M/s.Hidesign India Pvt. Ltd.,
                     Chennai-20                                                      ...Respondent

APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against

the order dated 31.1.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate

Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai made in I.T.A.No.2496/Mds/2017

for the assessment year 2013-14.

For Appellant: Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, SC assisted by Mr.S.Rajesh, JSC

Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J

This appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of

the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) challenging the order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.28 of 2021

dated 31.1.2018 made in I.T.A.No.2496/Mds/2017 on the file of the

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, 'A' Bench ('the Tribunal' for

brevity) for the assessment year 2013-14.

2. The Revenue has filed this appeal by raising the following

substantial questions of law:

“1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct and justified in holding that the assessee's belated remittance of PF & ESI as per relevant Act, but before the due date of filing of IT return in accordance with the IT Act, which is in contravention of provisions of Section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act ?

2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct in applying the decision of M/s.Industrial Security & Intelligence India Private Limited without considering circular No. 22/2015 dated 17.12.2015 which clearly states that only the remittance of employer's contribution to PF/ESI by the assessee as an employer on or before the due date of filing the return of income under Section 139(1) of the Act would be allowable as per provisions under Section 43B of the Act, further it clarified that it is not applicable to cases which

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.28 of 2021

are governed by Section 36(1)(va) of the Act ?

3. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct in deleting the addition made under Section 14A of the Act by holding that there cannot be any disallowance under Section 14A when there is no exempted income, when the provisions of the said Section as well as Rule 8D does not provide for any such exception ? And

4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribinal was correct in not appreciating the CBDT circular No.5/2014 wherein it is clarified that disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D has to be made even if the taxpayer in a particular year not earned any exempt income?”

3. We have heard Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned Standing

Counsel assisted by Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Junior Standing Counsel

appearing for the appellant/Revenue.

4. The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that

the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the low

tax effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.8.2019 issued by

the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ TCA.No.28 of 2021

T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J AND R.N.MANJULA,J

RS limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been

increased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in

this case is less than the threshold limit.

5. In the light of the said submissions, the above tax case appeal

is dismissed on account of the low tax effect. The substantial questions

of law raised are left open. In the event the tax effect is above the

threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the

Revenue to file a petition before this Court to restore the appeal to be

heard and decided on merits.

07.1.2021 To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai.

TCA.No.28 of 2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter