Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1989 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021
S.A.No.1849 of 1998
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATE: 29.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
S.A.No.1849 of 1998
and C.M.P.No.19116 of 1998
Karuppiah Thevar ... Appellant
Vs.
1.Tmt.Nagasundarammal (Died)
2.Tmt.Mariammal (Died)
3.Pandi Thevar
4.Chinnasamy Thevar
5.Tmt.Muniammal (Died)
6.Irilayee
7.Karuppiah
8.Karmegam
9.Muniandi
10.G.Vellaiyammal
11.N.Murugesan
12.M.Muniswari
13.V.Santhi
(Respondents 10 to 13 are brought on record as legal
heirs of deceased 1st respondent vide order dated 29.01.2021
in C.M.P.(MD)No.5732/2020)
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.No.1849 of 1998
14.N.Muniyandi
15.N.Govindaraj
16.N.Rasa Valli
17.N.Rajendran
18.N.Kannan
(Respondents 14 to 18 are brought on record as legal
heirs of deceased 2nd respondent vide order dated 29.01.2021
in C.M.P.(MD)No.5736/2020)
19.K.Govindharaj
20.K.Karuppaiah
21.Pappa
22.K.Tharmaraj
23.Vellaiyammal
24.K.Puyalpandi
25.Alagu Meenal
(Respondents 19 to 25 are brought on record as legal
heirs of deceased 2nd respondent vide order dated 29.01.2021
in C.M.P.(MD)No.5742/2020) ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure
Code, against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.1996 and made in A.S.No.47
of 1995 on the file of the Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram Confirming
the judgment and decree dated 10.02.1995 and made in O.S.No.357 of 1998 on the
file of District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.S.Ramesh
for Mr.V.Raghavachari for R6 & R7
Mr.C.Susikumar for R9
Mr.J.Bharathan
for Mr.T.R.Jeyapalam for R10 to R25
2/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.No.1849 of 1998
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for hearing, there is no representation for the
appellant. From the cause list, it is seen that notice sent to the appellant returned
with an endorsement 'deceased'. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed as
abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also
dismissed.
29.01.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsm
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram.
2.The District Munsif, Ramanathapuram.
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
http://www.judis.nic.in S.A.No.1849 of 1998
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vsm
S.A.No.1849 of 1998 and C.M.P.No.19116 of 1998
29.01.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!