Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1843 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021
R.C.No.5 of 2008
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 27.01.2021
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Ms.Justice R.N.MANJULA
Referred Case No.5 of 2008
Commissioner of Central Excise,
Coimbatore. ...Petitioner
Vs
1.Customs, Excise & Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal,
South Zonal Bench, Madras.
2.M/s.Chandra Textiles Ltd. ...Respondents
REFERRED CASE under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act,
1944 against Order No.1720/1998 dated 28.08.1998 on the file of the
Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench
at Madras.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, SSC
******
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
R.C.No.5 of 2008
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
We have heard the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the petitioner.
2.This referred case by the Revenue challenges the order passed by
the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal
Bench, Madras, which decided the issue in favour of the assessee.
3.The referred case was filed by the Revenue by raising the following
substantial question of law :
“Whether the CEGAT is correct in ordering for
extension of modvat credit on inputs received under cover
of endorsed invoices which are not prescribed documents
in terms of notification No.15/94 CE(NT) dated 30.3.94
read with Rule 52A, 57G (2) of CER, 44.”
4.The Revenue seeks to withdraw the case on account of low tax
effect in terms of the circular dated 22.08.2019 issued by the Central Board
of Indirect Taxes and Customs. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for
filing or pursuing any matter before the High Court has been increased to
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
R.C.No.5 of 2008
Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this case is less than
the threshold limit.
5.In the light of the above, the referred case is dismissed on the
ground of low tax effect and the substantial question of law raised is left
open. In the event, the tax effect is above the threshold limit fixed in the
said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to file a petition before this
Court to restore the matter to be heard and decided on merits.
(T.S.S.,J.) (R.N.M.,J.)
27.01.2021
abr
To
The Customs, Excise and Gold (Control)
Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai.
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
R.C.No.5 of 2008
T.S.Sivagnanam, J.
and R.N.Manjula, J.
abr
R.C.No.5 of 2008
27.01.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!