Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1525 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2021
T.C.A.No.1575 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 22.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
T.C.A.No.1575 of 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Shriram Chits & Investments P. Ltd.,
149, Greams Road,
Chennai – 6. ... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras,
"C" Bench, dated 19.12.2007 in I.TA.No.1060/Mds/2006, Assessment
Year 2002-03.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy,
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
T.C.A.No.1575 of 2008
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.) We have heard Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.R.Sivaraman, learned counsel
for the respondent/assessee.
2.The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order
dated 19.12.2007 made in I.TA.No.1060/Mds/2006 on the file of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “C” Bench (for brevity, the
Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2002-03.
3.The appeal was admitted on 06.11.2008 on the following
substantial question of law:
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in treating the payments due from defaulting subscribers as bad debt, when three is no relationship of creditor and debtor between them?”
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.1575 of 2008
4.The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant submits
that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the
Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued
by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary
limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been
increased to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this
case is less than the threshold limit.
5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal
is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The
substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect
in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular,
liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to
restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.]
Index : Yes/No 22.01.2021
Internet : Yes (2/2)
va
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.1575 of 2008
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
va
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “C” Bench
T.C.A.No.1575 of 2008 (2/2)
22.01.2021
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!